Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(Algebra/Homology): action of a bifunctor on cochain complexes and shifts #10880

Closed
wants to merge 43 commits into from

Conversation

joelriou
Copy link
Collaborator

@joelriou joelriou commented Feb 23, 2024

In this PR, we introduce the abbreviation CochainComplex.mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F for K₁ and K₂ two cochain complexes, and F a bifunctor. We obtain isomorphisms which express the behavior of this construction with respect to shifts on both variables: mapBifunctor (K₁⟦x⟧) K₂ F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦x⟧ and mapBifunctor K₁ (K₂⟦y⟧) F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦y⟧.


Open in Gitpod

@joelriou joelriou added WIP Work in progress and removed wontfix labels Feb 23, 2024
joelriou and others added 2 commits February 23, 2024 13:19
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR which is still in the queue. label Feb 23, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Mar 24, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Mar 24, 2024
Copy link
Member

@TwoFX TwoFX left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!
bors d+

@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Apr 7, 2024

✌️ joelriou can now approve this pull request. To approve and merge a pull request, simply reply with bors r+. More detailed instructions are available here.

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added delegated and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Apr 7, 2024
@joelriou
Copy link
Collaborator Author

joelriou commented Apr 7, 2024

Thanks for the review!

bors merge

@github-actions github-actions bot added the ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. label Apr 7, 2024
mathlib-bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 7, 2024
…d shifts (#10880)

In this PR, we introduce the abbreviation `CochainComplex.mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F` for `K₁` and `K₂` two cochain complexes, and `F` a bifunctor. We obtain isomorphisms which express the behavior of this construction with respect to shifts on both variables: `mapBifunctor (K₁⟦x⟧) K₂ F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦x⟧` and `mapBifunctor K₁ (K₂⟦y⟧) F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦y⟧`.



Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Apr 8, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(Algebra/Homology): action of a bifunctor on cochain complexes and shifts [Merged by Bors] - feat(Algebra/Homology): action of a bifunctor on cochain complexes and shifts Apr 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Apr 8, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the cochain-complex-mapbifunctor-shift branch April 8, 2024 00:27
Louddy pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
…d shifts (#10880)

In this PR, we introduce the abbreviation `CochainComplex.mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F` for `K₁` and `K₂` two cochain complexes, and `F` a bifunctor. We obtain isomorphisms which express the behavior of this construction with respect to shifts on both variables: `mapBifunctor (K₁⟦x⟧) K₂ F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦x⟧` and `mapBifunctor K₁ (K₂⟦y⟧) F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦y⟧`.



Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
atarnoam pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 16, 2024
…d shifts (#10880)

In this PR, we introduce the abbreviation `CochainComplex.mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F` for `K₁` and `K₂` two cochain complexes, and `F` a bifunctor. We obtain isomorphisms which express the behavior of this construction with respect to shifts on both variables: `mapBifunctor (K₁⟦x⟧) K₂ F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦x⟧` and `mapBifunctor K₁ (K₂⟦y⟧) F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦y⟧`.



Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
uniwuni pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 19, 2024
…d shifts (#10880)

In this PR, we introduce the abbreviation `CochainComplex.mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F` for `K₁` and `K₂` two cochain complexes, and `F` a bifunctor. We obtain isomorphisms which express the behavior of this construction with respect to shifts on both variables: `mapBifunctor (K₁⟦x⟧) K₂ F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦x⟧` and `mapBifunctor K₁ (K₂⟦y⟧) F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦y⟧`.



Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
callesonne pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2024
…d shifts (#10880)

In this PR, we introduce the abbreviation `CochainComplex.mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F` for `K₁` and `K₂` two cochain complexes, and `F` a bifunctor. We obtain isomorphisms which express the behavior of this construction with respect to shifts on both variables: `mapBifunctor (K₁⟦x⟧) K₂ F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦x⟧` and `mapBifunctor K₁ (K₂⟦y⟧) F ≅ (mapBifunctor K₁ K₂ F)⟦y⟧`.



Co-authored-by: Joël Riou <37772949+joelriou@users.noreply.github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
delegated ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-category-theory Category theory
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants