Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - feat(Algebra/Homology): the total complex of a bicomplex #9331

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from

Conversation

@joelriou joelriou added WIP Work in progress t-category-theory Category theory labels Dec 29, 2023
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the blocked-by-other-PR This PR depends on another PR to Mathlib label Feb 8, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Feb 8, 2024
@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot removed the merge-conflict The PR has a merge conflict with master, and needs manual merging. label Feb 9, 2024
@joelriou joelriou added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR and removed WIP Work in progress labels Feb 10, 2024
@jcommelin jcommelin self-assigned this Feb 13, 2024
Mathlib/Algebra/Homology/TotalComplex.lean Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
exact h₁₂ (by simpa only [← h, ← h₂] using ComplexShape.rel_π₂ c₁ c₁₂ i₁ h₁)
· exact d₂_eq_zero _ _ _ _ _ h₁
simp only [GradedObject.ι_descMapObj, comp_zero, w₁, w₂, add_zero]
d_comp_d' i₁₂ i₁₂' i₁₂'' h₁ h₂ := by
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This proof is massive. Do you think you can factor out some parts, and possibly deduplicate a bit?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review! In the last commit 2f17fe7 I have added definitions D₁ and D₂, so that the differential is d := D₁ + D₂, and in order to prove d_comp_d, I have obtained separate lemmas D₁_D₁, D₂_D₁ and D₂_D₂. The code is then slightly longer, but appears in smaller chunks; overall, it should be more manageable. (I also believe that introducing these definitions D₁ and D₂ will ease certain future developments.)

@jcommelin jcommelin added awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 13, 2024
@joelriou joelriou added awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR awaiting-CI and removed awaiting-author A reviewer has asked the author a question or requested changes labels Feb 13, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jcommelin jcommelin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks 🎉

bors merge

@leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot leanprover-community-mathlib4-bot added ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. and removed awaiting-review The author would like community review of the PR labels Feb 13, 2024
@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Build failed (retrying...):

@mathlib-bors
Copy link

mathlib-bors bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(Algebra/Homology): the total complex of a bicomplex [Merged by Bors] - feat(Algebra/Homology): the total complex of a bicomplex Feb 13, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Feb 13, 2024
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot deleted the total-complex branch February 13, 2024 23:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-category-theory Category theory
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants