[Transformation] Add L/l and c transformations (LEFT/RIGHT, L/R and OPEN/CLOSED)

[tonhuisman]

Just a small addition of what seems to be missing but useful.
(Changed form first using R/r to L/l as R is used for right-justify)
Added c for OPEN/CLOSED in addition to C, resolves #2351

[Budman1758]

#2351

any chance of getting this into the mix? Asking for a friend.... :)

[giig1967g]

Hi,
Removing the "R" formatting command is a breaking change.
I wouldn't approve it.

[tonhuisman]

Removing the "R" formatting command is a breaking change.
I wouldn't approve it.

I added it wrongly in the first commit, initially missed the existing Right-align feature, so I corrected it to L/l.

[tonhuisman]

any chance of getting this into the mix? Asking for a friend.... :)

I think most of your request have already been implemented (~9 months ago, according to git), so I added 'c' (OPEN/CLOSED) as a non-breaking alternative for 'C'. If you want O/C instead, you could use the 'Ln' justification for example [Plugin#State#c] for OPEN/CLOSED or [Plugin#State#c#L1] to display O/C instead, but that was already possible with the 'C' transformation 😄.

[giig1967g]

Removing the "R" formatting command is a breaking change.
I wouldn't approve it.

I added it wrongly in the first commit, initially missed the existing Right-align feature, so I corrected it to L/l.

I understand.

[TD-er]

I understand.

@giig1967g Does that mean, you now approve of this PR?

[giig1967g]

Hi,
yes it looks ok to me.