Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove VS/TFS SKU dependency and make TFVc plugin depend only on TFS OM SKU #25

Closed
fmallet opened this issue Apr 28, 2016 · 2 comments
Closed
Milestone

Comments

@fmallet
Copy link
Contributor

fmallet commented Apr 28, 2016

Currently, TFVC Plugin fails if Visual Studio of Team Foundation Server SKU is not installed. This ticket is to track making TFVC plugin work with only TFS OM SKU.

Some more related info :

Dinesh Bolkensteyn added a comment - 47 minutes ago - edited
Hello Vishnupriyan Radhamanalan, Mathew Aniyan
Just a quick message to let you know (if it was not the case) that the TFS 2015 Object Model now ships as a NuGet package and its license allows it to be redistributed. See http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckh/archive/2015/08/10/nuget-packages-for-tfs-and-visual-studio-online-net-client-object-model.aspx

Vishnupriyan Radhamanalan added a comment - 27 minutes ago
Thanks Dinesh.
Yes, we discussed about taking dependency on the TFS Object Model. However, we want to understand the compatibility between different versions - 2013, 2015. So, We will create a separate ticket to work on this.

@fmallet fmallet added this to the 2.2 milestone Apr 28, 2016
@lg2de lg2de removed this from the 2.2 milestone Jul 16, 2019
@lg2de
Copy link
Owner

lg2de commented Jul 16, 2019

With #48 I'm planning to switch to Microsoft.TeamFoundationServer.ExtendedClient package, which should solve this issue.

@lg2de lg2de added this to the 2.3 milestone Jul 16, 2019
@lg2de
Copy link
Owner

lg2de commented Oct 4, 2019

Fixed with #48.

@lg2de lg2de closed this as completed Oct 4, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants