Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
65 lines (49 loc) · 4.06 KB

agile.md

File metadata and controls

65 lines (49 loc) · 4.06 KB
Raw

ACE Agile Chart

MVP/POC

The purpose of the ACE Framework MVP is to create a small "toy" example of the ACE Framework primarily as demonstration purposes. In other words, this is a super simple implementation to show "Hey look, it actually works."

The idea here is that we will probably also learn valuable lessons before we scale up to multi-agent deployments or more involved environments. For instance, we will probably want to solve a bunch of API and architectural problems before we try to build ACE agents that control robots or interact in complex social environments.

Acceptance Criteria

  1. Python: Must be Python-native or at least mostly Python. This is to maximize for accessibility and learning. Thus we should avoid too many exotic requirements, such as other servers or interpreters.
  2. Hackable: Must be optimized for easy copy/paste and/or tinkering. Hackability will increase immediate utility and adoption. It will also make it easier for people to poke and modify. Furthermore, by starting with a "hackability" mindset, this will set the stage for polymorphic implementations later.
  3. Simple & Easy: Must be relatively easy to setup and deploy. Ideally, little more than pip install -r requirements.txt followed by python ace.py or something like that. Again, this is to maximize uptake for people such as novices and college students. Future versions can be more involved, such as with containers and such.
  4. Visual: Must have some kind of visual (PyGame, Web UI, Tkinter, whatever) that can give users at least a little "peek under the hood" plus some intuitive usability. Ideally it would ultimately have some kind of audiovisual avatar, but this is more of a long-term idea.
  5. Full ACE: Must implement all six layers and both buses with clear dilineations and demarcations. In other words, it must be a true and full implementation of the ACE Framework.

Roadmap

  • MVP
    • Toy, demo example, easy to learn on
    • Learn lessons, overcome problems, refine architecture, document as we go
    • Get something mostly as a simple proof of concept
  • Release 1 - Robustness
    • Refactor with lessons learned
    • Increase robustness and resilience
    • Refine architecture, establish best practices
  • Release 2 - Configurability
    • Focus on flexibility and configurability e.g. ACE just needs a few config changes and the entire purpose changes
    • Remember, hackability means easier to become polymorphic!
    • Everything defined as some JSON or YAML files? Dunno
  • Release 3 - Extensibility
    • Focus on spontaneous extension of hardware and/or software capabilities
    • Plug and play architecture? (Find and use new tools, APIs, etc)
  • Release 4 - Deployability
    • Focus on "anywhere, anytime" mentality
    • Create kernels that can run in any container, any environment, thus can be used for games, robots, enterprise agents, etc
  • Release 5 - Polymorphic
    • Focus on self-modification (e.g. self-configuration, self-extension, etc)
    • Self-transforming in order to better pursue aspirations

Teams

In the future, as there is growing interest (and as we learn to coordinate better) we will work to enable and facilitate multiple teams. We will follow an Agile/Scrum model whereby each team is capped at 7 members. At the same time, the core ACE team will be available to provide guidance and oversight.

Core Team

The Core Team will have several roles that can be leveraged to help other teams.

  • Product Owner: Dave
    • Sets overall requirements and acceptance criteria
    • Writes user stories, roadmap, etc
    • Available to consult with other teams
    • Possibly split into multiple roles
  • Scrum Master: ??? (TBD)
    • Primary stakeholder responsible for process
    • Communicates with product owner (creates boundary)

Scrum Teams

Each individual scrum team will need a project lead or lead developer. This is someone who will take full ownership of the codebase and see the project through to the end.

  • Lead Developer: ???
    • Senior-most developer (or one with most relevant experience
    • Responsible for major architectural decisions, etc