Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Poster Creation Group] IPNS #15

Open
ghost opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 10 comments
Open

[Poster Creation Group] IPNS #15

ghost opened this issue Jun 25, 2018 · 10 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 25, 2018

[Poster Creation Group] IPNS

Your Name: @vasco-santos

Session Type (choose one): 2-3 person poster group

Optional: could convert this to a talk

Title (a few words): What is behind IPNS?

Abstract (1 sentence up to a couple paragraphs, as you prefer):

IPFS is powered by content-addressed data, which by nature is immutable. However, there are numerous use cases where we need mutable data. This is where IPNS gets into the equation, and consequently, this poster aims to detail how it is being done.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jun 25, 2018

Is this meant for the IPFS meetings?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 25, 2018

@lgierth Probably, yes. Can you think of a good libp2p topic to replace this? Else, we can close this issue.

@ghost ghost mentioned this issue Jun 25, 2018
4 tasks
@ghost ghost assigned vasco-santos Jun 26, 2018
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 26, 2018

There is discussion here that makes arguments both for and against IPNS being considered part of libp2p.

In light of this, I propose that we do include IPNS as a libp2p poster or presentation topic. I've assigned it to @vasco-santos (who requested it in #10 (comment).

@vasco-santos Can you fill in the issue above? Pick between presentation and poster, and give it a title and short abstract for Sched.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 26, 2018

@vasco-santos But if you prefer, we can move this to the IPFS meeting's sessions instead. My point is really just that it's a good poster group, and if it straddles the line, it probably doesn't matter which event it is part of. If it's important to you, though, let's move it.

@vasco-santos
Copy link
Member

Thanks @mgoelzer ! I will fill this issue between today and tomorrow!

@vasco-santos
Copy link
Member

@mgoelzer the description is updated.

I decided to keep the Poster Creation Group category, but I am also available for preparing a presentation if you have that preference.

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 28, 2018

@vasco-santos Awesome - thank you!

The Poster Creation Group vs Presentation decision is up to you. They are both valuable. If you'd rather do a presentation, that would be fine. Just update the issue. But the PCG's will be fun and interactive for attendees, so that is the benefit of doing those. Again, your call.

@ghost ghost added the ready-to-schedule label Jun 28, 2018
@vasco-santos
Copy link
Member

yeah! I also agree that the poster creation group will be more interesting and interactive!

@hugomrdias
Copy link
Member

Should we request here to be part of this poster group ?

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jun 29, 2018

@hugomrdias Good question. I had been thinking that the groups would form ad hoc, so I was not planning to create a list of members in advance. Just one leader/moderator to anchor the group to ensure that there is a nucleus around which the group can form. So, I do not think it's necessary.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants