Feature/split lime utils logic

[selankon]

• Move all logic outside the rpcd

[ilario]

This is great!
But we are also planning to, some day, split lime.utils from lime-system, see #771

And it will be confusing if we will have:

• lime.utils packaged in a future lime-utils package and located at /usr/lib/lua/lime/utils.lua

and

• lime-utils packaged in ubus-lime-utils and located at /usr/lib/lua/lime-utils.lua

This is already represented by the fact that lime-utils.lua is importing lime.utils:

lime-packages/packages/ubus-lime-utils/files/usr/lib/lua/lime-utils.lua

Line 6 in 7734e99

local utils = require 'lime.utils'

What do you think about naming these new files including the ubus- prefix?

Oooooor, alternatively, the new lime-utils.lua file could also include the functions from the lime-system's lime.utils. On this regard, I have a question dictated by ignorance: what is the difference from the utils included in ubus-lime-utils and in lime-system's lime.utils?

[spiccinini]

+1 to Illario's comment, I think this PR is a step required to splitting this functionality and lime.utils in its own package. For me lets merge this and address it in other PR

[ilario]

+1 to Illario's comment, I think this PR is a step required to splitting this functionality and lime.utils in its own package. For me lets merge this and address it in other PR

Mh? What do you mean?
Are we going to merge ubus-lime-utils with the lime-utils from lime-system?