Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LPS-128444 #141

Closed
wants to merge 78 commits into from
Closed

LPS-128444 #141

wants to merge 78 commits into from

Conversation

cleydyr
Copy link

@cleydyr cleydyr commented Mar 1, 2021

This is a revert for LPS-114936. LPS-114936 was supposed to fix a double request, but I couldn't reproduce the double request after all after reverting LPS-114936 by putting a breakpoint in com.liferay.dynamic.data.mapping.data.provider.internal.DDMDataProviderInvokerImpl#156

Also, limiting the maximum number of threads to 1 will cause any concurrent additional requests to be rejected, which is undesirable.

Igor Beslic and others added 30 commits February 28, 2021 22:07
…k settings with jvm options extracted from archive
…ns, by default if the current language doesn't have a translation the default language is used
@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

CI is automatically triggering the following test suites:

  •     ci:test:relevant
  •     ci:test:sf

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 3 minutes

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 6d0946d8d69fb40dccd618decdee33da3be90490

Sender Branch:

Branch Name: LPS-128444
Branch GIT ID: 176614e54ce1e62236123acb56820ca1609fa5c5

1 out of 1jobs PASSED
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:stable - 9 out of 9 jobs passed

✔️ ci:test:relevant - 25 out of 26 jobs passed in 1 hour 31 minutes

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 6d0946d8d69fb40dccd618decdee33da3be90490

Upstream Comparison:

Branch GIT ID: 44a69fda45de6434bd9c01e993f84cf8ed3fb772
Jenkins Build URL: Acceptance Upstream DXP (master) #1590

ci:test:stable - 9 out of 9 jobs PASSED
9 Successful Jobs:
ci:test:relevant - 24 out of 26 jobs PASSED
24 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

This pull contains no unique failures.


Failures in common with acceptance upstream results at 44a69fd:
  1. test-portal-acceptance-pullrequest-batch(master)/modules-integration-mysql57-jdk8/0
    Job Results:

    1168 Tests Passed.
    1 Test Failed.

    1. AXIS_VARIABLE=2,label_exp=!master #406079
      1. PortalLogAssertorTest.testScanXMLLog
        junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: 
        com.liferay.portal.verify.VerifyException: com.liferay.commerce.currency.exception.NoSuchCurrencyException: No CommerceCurrency exists with the key {companyId=20101, code=USD}
        com.liferay.portal.verify.VerifyException: com.liferay.commerce.currency.exception.NoSuchCurrencyException: No CommerceCurrency exists with the key {companyId=20101, code=USD}
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.VerifyProcess.verify(VerifyProcess.java:74)
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.extender.internal.osgi.commands.VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.executeVerifyProcesses(VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.java:294)
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.extender.internal.osgi.commands.VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands$1.run(VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.java:346)
        	at com.liferay.portal.output.stream.container.internal.OutputStreamContainerFactoryTrackerImpl.runWithSwappedLog(OutputStreamContainerFactoryTrackerImpl.java:134)
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.extender.internal.osgi.commands.VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.executeVerifyProcesses(VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.java:341)
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.extender.internal.osgi.commands.VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands._execute(VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.java:395)
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.extender.internal.osgi.commands.VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.access$200(VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands.java:80)
        	at com.liferay.portal.verify.extender.internal.osgi.commands.VerifyProcessTrackerOSGiCommands$VerifyServic...

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

@natocesarrego
Copy link

Hi @cleydyr,

Your fix makes sense to me, although I'm afraid that this pull can reintroduce the issue reported on LPS-114936. 😬 Do you mind to talk to Lino in order to find out the steps he has performed to reproduce the LPS-114936?

Thanks in advance.

@cleydyr
Copy link
Author

cleydyr commented Mar 2, 2021

Sure, Renatonho. I'd already talked to @linolaoj via Slack. He said it was no problem to revert his commit.

@cleydyr
Copy link
Author

cleydyr commented Mar 2, 2021

@natocesarrego, I couldn't reproduce it at all, as I stated in the initial comment for this issue. So maybe it was just a delay in the logs that presented two messages within a short period of time, but not due to two different requests. Or something changed on the frontend logic that made the source of double requests to disappear.

@natocesarrego
Copy link

Ok, @cleydyr. Thanks for reaching out Lino. I'll forward your pull right now. 😉

@natocesarrego
Copy link

ci:forward

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

CI is automatically triggering the following test suites:

  •     ci:test:relevant
  •     ci:test:sf

The pull request will automatically be forwarded to the user brianchandotcom if the following test suites pass:

  •     ci:test:relevant
  •     ci:test:sf
  •     ci:test:stable

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

Skipping previously passed test suites:
ci:test:relevant
ci:test:sf

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

All required test suite(s) passed.
Forwarding pullrequest to brianchandotcom.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request has been successfully forwarded to brianchandotcom#99472

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.