Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

LPS-122810 Set voted style with a unique style #615

Closed
wants to merge 69 commits into from

Conversation

LuismiBarcos
Copy link

No description provided.

adolfopa and others added 30 commits February 24, 2021 09:37
…atibilityConverterImpl, to avoid converting it every time we save the web content.
…tibility-expected-results.xml since if we format this file we can not use Assert.assertEquals(expectedDocument.formattedString(), document.formattedString()); to compare it
…est and replace it with testGetLinkToLayoutValue in JournalContentCompatibilityConverterTest
The <clay:management-toolbar-v2 /> tag has been replaced with the
<clay:management-toolbar /> tag (which uses clay v3).

Creating, merging and deleting tags should work as expected.

**Test plan**:
- Navigate to **Categorization**>**Tags**
- Assert that you can create a tag
- Assert that you can delete the tag you created previously
- Assert that you can merge two or more tags correctly.
… already deployed the jar as module. This may cause a "uses" constraint violation which is discovered when upgrade Log4J.
ealonso and others added 7 commits February 24, 2021 20:38
…y for web content and now in web content we are using the new data engine
The <clay:management-toolbar-v2 /> tag has been replaced with the
<clay:management-toolbar /> tag (which uses clay v3).

**Test plan**:
- Navigate to **Content & Data** > **Documents and Media**
- Uploading new files should work as expected
- Editing tags should work as expected
- Deleting items should work as expected
- Moving items to a new folder should work as expected
- Creating Document Types should work as expected
- Creating Metadata Sets should work as expected
@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

To conserve resources, the PR Tester does not automatically run for every pull.

If your code changes were already tested in another pull, reference that pull in this pull so the test results can be analyzed.

If your pull was never tested, comment "ci:test" to run the PR Tester for this pull.

@javierdearcos
Copy link

ci:forward

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

CI is automatically triggering the following test suites:

  •     ci:test:relevant
  •     ci:test:sf

The pull request will automatically be forwarded to the user brianchandotcom if the following test suites pass:

  •     ci:test:relevant
  •     ci:test:sf
  •     ci:test:stable

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:sf - 1 out of 1 jobs passed in 36 seconds

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 91b812c23ec96d946f5dcf13449e4883d10f209e

Sender Branch:

Branch Name: LPS-122810
Branch GIT ID: f342c9de7f7a4700e212e9e0c72700114bd59353

1 out of 1jobs PASSED
1 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

✔️ ci:test:stable - 9 out of 9 jobs passed

✔️ ci:test:relevant - 23 out of 23 jobs passed in 1 hour 39 minutes

Click here for more details.

Base Branch:

Branch Name: master
Branch GIT ID: 91b812c23ec96d946f5dcf13449e4883d10f209e

Upstream Comparison:

Branch GIT ID: 232b7029dbcc5cc632db42fdd9f88161634e3e96
Jenkins Build URL: Acceptance Upstream DXP (master) #1578

ci:test:stable - 9 out of 9 jobs PASSED
9 Successful Jobs:
ci:test:relevant - 23 out of 23 jobs PASSED
23 Successful Jobs:
For more details click here.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

All required test suite(s) passed.
Forwarding pullrequest to brianchandotcom.

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

Pull request has been successfully forwarded to brianchandotcom#99252

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

@liferay-continuous-integration
Copy link
Collaborator

@LuismiBarcos LuismiBarcos deleted the LPS-122810 branch April 12, 2021 17:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.