You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noticed that the generated protobuf files use the default code generator from Google, which is known for generating code with significant runtime overhead (due to heavy use of reflection and pointer types).
gogo/protobuf is an alternative implementation of the code generator and libraries, with a focus on lowering the runtime footprint of the protobuf generated files.
I was wondering if there was a reason why the lightstep tracer was not using gogo/protobuf?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
achille-roussel
changed the title
Generate protobuf files with gogo/probuf
Generate protobuf files with gogo/protobuf
Oct 21, 2018
Hello,
I noticed that the generated protobuf files use the default code generator from Google, which is known for generating code with significant runtime overhead (due to heavy use of reflection and pointer types).
gogo/protobuf is an alternative implementation of the code generator and libraries, with a focus on lowering the runtime footprint of the protobuf generated files.
I was wondering if there was a reason why the lightstep tracer was not using gogo/protobuf?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: