Bug: Annotations for nested types are ignored

[kabell]

Description

When a pydantic model contains a simple annotated attribute, the restrictions from the annotation are used for generating the value.

Example:

Dimension = Annotated[int, Field(gt=1000, lt=2000)]

class Item(BaseModel):
    x: Dimension

class ItemFactory(ModelFactory):
    __model__ = Item

print(ItemFactory.build())

>>> x=1456

However, if I change the Item model to

class Item(BaseModel):
    dimensions: list[Dimension]

I get the following error saying that polyfactory generated the value 8569

>>>
pydantic_core._pydantic_core.ValidationError: 1 validation error for Item
dimensions.0
  Input should be less than 2000 [type=less_than, input_value=8569, input_type=int]
    For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.4/v/less_than

URL to code causing the issue

No response

MCVE

from polyfactory.factories.pydantic_factory import ModelFactory
from typing import Annotated
from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

Dimension = Annotated[int, Field(gt=1000, lt=2000)]

class Item(BaseModel):
    dimensions: list[Dimension]


class ItemFactory(ModelFactory):
    __model__ = Item


print(ItemFactory.build())

Steps to reproduce

1. Go to '...'
2. Click on '....'
3. Scroll down to '....'
4. See error

Screenshots

"In the format of: ![SCREENSHOT_DESCRIPTION](SCREENSHOT_LINK.png)"

Logs

No response

Release Version

2.11.0

Platform

• Linux
• Mac
• Windows
• Other (Please specify in the description above)

---

Note

While we are open for sponsoring on GitHub Sponsors and
OpenCollective, we also utilize Polar.sh to engage in pledge-based sponsorship.

Check out all issues funded or available for funding on our Polar.sh Litestar dashboard

• If you would like to see an issue prioritized, make a pledge towards it!
• We receive the pledge once the issue is completed & verified
• This, along with engagement in the community, helps us know which features are a priority to our users.

[guacs]

@kabell thanks for reporting this :)

I am able to reproduce this but haven't gotten a chance to look into it in detail yet.