Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pull] main from tc39:main #17

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023
Merged

[pull] main from tc39:main #17

merged 6 commits into from
Nov 1, 2023

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Oct 23, 2023

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

VoltrexKeyva and others added 2 commits October 22, 2023 21:16
This is the only `<img>` element without an alt text in the entire
specification, so add an alt text.
@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Oct 23, 2023
shvaikalesh and others added 4 commits October 24, 2023 14:25
…more precise (#3164)

This is more precise specification with EvaluatePropertyAccessWithExpressionKey'
usage and also in line with parameter specification of EvaluatePropertyAccessWithIdentifierKey.
With two assertions to make clear the validity of narrowing. This is an
exact copy of the change proposed in the PR #3127(#3127).
This makes clear arguments passed to ResolveExport and GetImportedModule is not null.
@ljharb ljharb merged commit ea5ee21 into ljharb:main Nov 1, 2023
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants