-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reestablish conn with mixnode if err occurs #501
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! LGTM!
Another CI failure appears :) I'll take a look |
It's still hard to debug since we cannot see logs from nodes, but CI seems to be failed because CI was busy at that time (similar as #494 and #492). I think this PR didn't affect to the CI failure because this PR is very simple and doesn't change the normal behavior. After all, I'll open another PR which helps us to see logs from nodes when CI integration tests fail. |
So, looks like issue is in windows right? Why windows why??? |
It seems it's not only in windows. Codecov in ubuntu also fails with the similar (but maybe different) symptom. I'm trying to debug it again before merging this. |
I've found that CIs on Windows are 2~3x slower than Ubuntu for some reason, even for the master branch: https://github.com/logos-co/nomos-node/actions/runs/6743301131/job/18330953687. So, I think the CI failures of this PR aren't related to the changes of this PR. We'll be able to be more confident about it with PR #508 soon (If any unexpected error isn't found in the logs, we could say the failure is due to the slow machine). |
Sounds good. I will try locally as I have windows myself and post results here. |
Windows tests succeed locally. So probably something going around the gh runner. |
c4c212a
to
b18e85e
Compare
2f637c5
to
d4bcd70
Compare
46bf96e
to
2f0a837
Compare
I'm reopening the PR #445, now that CI (integration test) is stable.
99% is the same as the PR #445, but I added an one-line commit: 3414c58. Please double check this, @al8n.
Since #445 has been already reviewed, I didn't assign many reviewers. But, pls feel free to have a look.