Fix code example in README

[jdreesen]

This PR

• Fixed the code example in the readme.

[drupol]

Hi mate,

Thanks for your contribution (all of them), unfortunately, I have to decline this one. The README is good as it is and it's working perfectly well, there is no need to make that change.

[jdreesen]

No, it isn't. At least there's a syntax error in lines 60/61: https://3v4l.org/flYbb

Apart from that, the generator yields three values while the sprintf calls in lines 64/65 expect only two parameters: the result and the duration (in that order).

[drupol]

Oh indeed, you're perfectly right ! Sorry about that.

[drupol]

Thanks !!!

[drupol]

I updated the README again, the code example was misleading, it's now better!

[jdreesen]

But now it isn't using the fibonacci function anymore... see: e56d672#r46031564

[drupol]

Looks like I'm working too late, I'll fix this tomorrow! Thanks!