-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 111
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Introduced Lotus::Action::Params#get #89
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
2 similar comments
Why we only use I ❤️ this approach... params.get('customer_name') # => "Luca"
params.get(:customer_name) # => "Luca" |
@vyper hash is nice but it does not represent the nested attributes very well. For that very reason, I think we should stick to string. |
@jodosha 👍 |
jodosha
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 21, 2015
Introduced Lotus::Action::Params#get
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What
Introduced
Lotus::Action::Params#get
as a safe way to access (nested) attributes.Why?
NoMethodErrors
that can be caused by the subscriber notation. Egparams[:address][:street]
, if:address
isn't sent, the action will blow up. The lack of this new suggested API (#get
) will force developers to write defensive code to access nested attributes.Usage