[TL-UL] Address missing error occurs in next transaction

[weicaiyang]

@eunchan

addrmiss is latch during address phase. In the same cycle, you use it to generate error, so that error is actually sent out in next tlul transaction.

[eunchan]

Thanks for the report. Now the fix is in PR #247

[tjaychen]

good catch all!

…

On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:57 PM Eunchan Kim ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks for the report. Now the fix is in PR #247 <#247> — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#246?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAH2RSQNI26EOWNT26DIFJDQLFCXDA5CNFSM4IZUFJ3KYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOD7MQNYI#issuecomment-534316769>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAH2RSSG2THCOCHQYVJWV4DQLFCXDANCNFSM4IZUFJ3A> .

[weicaiyang]

Thanks for the quick fix. The behavior is expected now.