Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

♻ Simplify iterator and removeWhere logic #6

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2020

Conversation

lig
Copy link
Contributor

@lig lig commented Nov 26, 2020

No description provided.

@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 35

  • 3 of 3 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 1 file are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage decreased (-2.0%) to 93.182%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 32: -2.0%
Covered Lines: 41
Relevant Lines: 44

💛 - Coveralls

lib/ordered_set.dart Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@lig
Copy link
Contributor Author

lig commented Nov 28, 2020

@luanpotter what do you think?

lib/ordered_set.dart Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@luanpotter
Copy link
Member

Nice cleanup! So should we merge this first and then the non-null thing? @lig
(as this can improve both the current release and the first non-null release)

@lig
Copy link
Contributor Author

lig commented Nov 29, 2020

@luanpotter I would like to get this in first and then rebase null safety on it. As far as I see around what others are doing in other projects it is better to keep the null safety code in a separate branch for now and release nullsafety suffixed package from that branch.

Co-authored-by: Luan Nico <luanpotter27@gmail.com>
@luanpotter luanpotter merged commit 1289af7 into bluefireteam:master Nov 29, 2020
@lig
Copy link
Contributor Author

lig commented Nov 29, 2020

@luanpotter great thanks! Give me some time to rebase #5 then.

@lig lig deleted the simplify-code branch November 29, 2020 18:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants