Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"Modernize" the shortcut editor #60

Open
tsujan opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 7 comments
Open

"Modernize" the shortcut editor #60

tsujan opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@tsujan
Copy link
Member

tsujan commented Apr 18, 2018

Qt can handle that now.

NOTE: The same thing should be done in all parts of LXQt, IMO. Those shortcut editors may have been the best choice before -- although I don't think so -- but not anymore.

@tsujan tsujan self-assigned this Apr 18, 2018
@agaida
Copy link
Member

agaida commented Apr 18, 2018

So changing this and having a reference implementation is a good thing.

@tsujan
Copy link
Member Author

tsujan commented Apr 18, 2018

Did it for QTerminal before.

@agaida
Copy link
Member

agaida commented Apr 18, 2018

fine

@tsujan tsujan mentioned this issue Jan 6, 2019
@shlyakpavel
Copy link
Member

Did it for QTerminal before.

Is that what you mean? lxqt/qterminal#398

@tsujan
Copy link
Member Author

tsujan commented Jan 6, 2019

Yes, actually https://github.com/lxqt/qterminal/pull/399/files. A more advanced version of it -- with ambiguity warnings and reserved shortcuts -- is in FeatherPad but QTerminal's shortcut editor is enough.

@shlyakpavel
Copy link
Member

Yes, actually https://github.com/lxqt/qterminal/pull/399/files. A more advanced version of it -- with ambiguity warnings and reserved shortcuts -- is in FeatherPad but QTerminal's shortcut editor is enough.

The one in FeatherPad was too shocking for me... It is not a Qt way to do things. Hardcored keys, for example, are quite a bad idea... For example
tsujan/FeatherPad#221 (comment)

@tsujan
Copy link
Member Author

tsujan commented Jan 6, 2019

It is not a Qt way to do things.

I respect Qt ways, more or less, in LXQt but, in my own apps, I don't limit myself to "standards" because, most of the time, they aren't enough. That's a discussion for another time and another place...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants