You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It's always good scientific practice to also give references to other freely available recommender systems and maybe a small matrix comparing their main features. This has several benefits:
It allows new user to get a fast overview of freely available alternatives
It provides an overview of the main differences to the alternatives
Showing that there are alternatives and that their main feature are known to the authors of LightFM increases their reputation and perceived expertise.
I think the main alternatives are Mahout, PyFM and LensKit. All of them seem to provide only Collaborative Filtering. Interesting features would be: scalability/runtime performance, language bindings, algorithms/methods.
I know that this issue could be quite work intense but it would be nice to have in order to convince people to use LightFM ;-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's always good scientific practice to also give references to other freely available recommender systems and maybe a small matrix comparing their main features. This has several benefits:
I think the main alternatives are Mahout, PyFM and LensKit. All of them seem to provide only Collaborative Filtering. Interesting features would be: scalability/runtime performance, language bindings, algorithms/methods.
I know that this issue could be quite work intense but it would be nice to have in order to convince people to use LightFM ;-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: