Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Strongly signed version of Machine.Specifications #298

Closed
ivanz opened this issue Jul 29, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Strongly signed version of Machine.Specifications #298

ivanz opened this issue Jul 29, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@ivanz
Copy link
Contributor

ivanz commented Jul 29, 2016

There used to be a strongly signed version on Nuget and still is, but the current build pipeline doesn't create nor publish a "-Signed" package.

Download numbers of the Signed packages are quite low.

@lwuckel
Copy link

lwuckel commented Feb 9, 2017

Where can I find the "-Signed" package v0.11 ?
Or how can I build it for myself?

Regards, Lars

@JohannesHoppe
Copy link

Support for strong-name signing was dropped, back then in early 2014.
see #190

@ivanz ivanz closed this as completed Apr 1, 2017
@ivanz ivanz reopened this Apr 1, 2017
@ivanz ivanz closed this as completed Aug 21, 2017
@BrunoJuchli
Copy link
Contributor

BrunoJuchli commented Aug 22, 2017

@JohannesHoppe actually according to #190 that's not the Case.
In short:

Daniel Marbach asked whether there was a reason not to drop it - a reason why there should be a signed version, and it has been found:

(@ivanz this might be of interest to you, too:)

It's true when you have a signed assembly with an InternalsVisibleTo attribute to a specification assembly the specification assembly needs to be strong named too. I'm closing this issue.

NameOfTheDragon later found a specific workaround for his use-case - not signing non-release builds and hence testing non-release builds.

However, Daniel never said that signed-builds will be removed.

I personally have never used the signed version of machine.specifications - because i've never produced signed assemblies. So I'm not complaining that there's no signed version, just trying to set the record straight.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants