-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
MPI support #83
Comments
Based on my experience with a competing project (create_compressed_fs from cloop-utils) it can be quite beneficial but you need to make sure that the pipeline is constantly filled, the latencies are reduced as far as possible (TCP_NODELAY, TCP_QUICKACK) and the network performs very well in general. |
I understand why high throughput would be beneficial, but low latency? Hm, not sure why would that help, as long as CPUs are the actual bottleneck of the whole process. |
MPI parallel compression might not be needed. When using |
why not both? ;) |
Hi,
I'm a complete noob in MPI parallel programming and I can't stop the impression that this environment lacks software for daily, CPU-intensive tasks, such as file compression.
If and when I get up to a point when I'm comfortable with MPI libraries, I'd gladly dive into implementing this feature.
However, I was curious whether the approach of spreading the compression tasks over multiple machines in LAN has been tried in the past, and maybe it's been already proven to be pointless?
Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: