Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Calibration trimmer potentiometer on the front #3

Closed
fiechr opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Calibration trimmer potentiometer on the front #3

fiechr opened this issue Oct 22, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@fiechr
Copy link

fiechr commented Oct 22, 2015

Sorry for opening an issue for this, because it's more of a simple question than a problem:

Is the trimmer labeled "CAL" on the front panel used in your firmware at all? It is not mentioned anywhere - so I guess temperature correction is (only) applied by the value in the software settings as described in the docs?

@madworm
Copy link
Owner

madworm commented Oct 22, 2015

You are 100% spot on. As I did not trace out the schematic for the thermo-couple circuit, I left that cal-potentiometer alone. I don't know what it does exactly and how it might affect the temperature reading.

"Never change a running system".

@fiechr
Copy link
Author

fiechr commented Oct 23, 2015

Ok! Thanks for clearing that up.

I tried to make a schematic of that part of the board. I'm really not an electronics expert, so I can't guarantee everything is correct, especially not about the part before the OpAmp (this diode stuff seems odd to me).
But nevertheless the part after it seems more clear: The resistance of the negative feedback loop of the OpAmp is changed by the potentiometer. This changes the gain of the amp, which means the voltage on the OUT pin changes also slightly.
So if the thermocouple measures a too low (high) temperature, the amplified voltage can be raised (lowered) by this mechanism.

So I guess it should be possible to use this trimmer without negative side effects, because the value is corrected before the software control loop. I would prefer to set it this way, because the value is device-dependent anyway.

But I could be wrong about that...

youyue858d_cal sch
(Updated schematic, changed direction of D10)

@madworm
Copy link
Owner

madworm commented Oct 23, 2015

The double diodes clamp the input voltage to about +- 0.7V or so. No cold-junction compensation.

D10 is very odd...

@fiechr
Copy link
Author

fiechr commented Oct 24, 2015

Well, D10 is actually facing in the other direction on the board. ;-)

@madworm madworm closed this as completed Apr 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants