Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix issue with saving filters from url-applier to default view of bookmark #29861

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 9, 2020

Conversation

Nazar65
Copy link
Member

@Nazar65 Nazar65 commented Sep 1, 2020

Description (*)

Related Pull Requests

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

  1. Fixes Bookmark saves filter from url-applier component to default view in some cases adobe-stock-integration#1789

Manual testing scenarios (*)

  1. Open media gallery

  2. Open view details from image

  3. Click on Used in Categories link

  4. Category grid rendered with url-filter applier, and asset filter applied

  5. Default view of bookmark saved without filter

Questions or comments

Contribution checklist (*)

  • Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 1, 2020

Hi @Nazar65. Thank you for your contribution
Here is some useful tips how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.
Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:

  • @magento give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento give me 2.4-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names. Allowed build names are:

  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE,
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests

You can find more information about the builds here

ℹ️ Please run only needed test builds instead of all when developing. Please run all test builds before sending your PR for review.

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Guide documentation.

⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all Pull Requests must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of Pull Requests happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

🎥 You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

@Nazar65
Copy link
Member Author

Nazar65 commented Sep 1, 2020

@magento run all tests

@rogyar rogyar self-assigned this Sep 2, 2020
@sivaschenko sivaschenko added Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Severity: S2 Major restrictions or short-term circumventions are required until a fix is available. Auto-Tests: Covered All changes in Pull Request is covered by auto-tests labels Sep 2, 2020
@rogyar
Copy link
Contributor

rogyar commented Sep 2, 2020

Hi @sivaschenko. Just want to double-check that we are on the same page.
You've added the "Auto-Tests: Covered" label with no actual coverage introduced in this PR. Does it mean that the change in this PR is supposed to fix the existing failing test?

Thank you.

@Nazar65
Copy link
Member Author

Nazar65 commented Sep 2, 2020

@rogyar failing test is not related to the changes in this pr, also this behaviour already covered by mftf test.

@rogyar
Copy link
Contributor

rogyar commented Sep 2, 2020

Hi @Nazar65. Thank you for the clarification.
I mean, if we provide a fix and it's already covered by MFTF tests, usually it means that without the provided fix the tests are supposed to be failing. So the fix eventually fixes the previously failing tests.

If this assumption is correct for the current PR, that's great.

Thanks

@sidolov
Copy link
Contributor

sidolov commented Sep 2, 2020

@sivaschenko , @Nazar65 could you please clarify the automation status? I agree with @rogyar , if we are going to fix something- it should be covered with a test. If test is already created then why it's green since we have a bug in functionality?

@Nazar65
Copy link
Member Author

Nazar65 commented Sep 2, 2020

@sidolov this pr fixes bug with js initialization, so covering such functionality with tests is no good idea, because we will introduce one more flaky test, and in this case the ui_bookmark table also needs to be empty.

@sivaschenko
Copy link
Member

sivaschenko commented Sep 3, 2020

@sidolov @rogyar the PR contains an improvement to stability of the functionality that is covered by MFTF tests.

In case there is a PR that contains refactoring or implementation change to existing functionality that is covered by MFTF tests, such PR is covered with tests even if it does not change the test results.

@sivaschenko
Copy link
Member

@magento run all tests

@sidolov sidolov moved this from Pending Review to Review in Progress in Pull Requests Dashboard Sep 3, 2020
@ghost ghost moved this from Review in Progress to Ready for Testing in Pull Requests Dashboard Sep 6, 2020
@ghost ghost assigned sivaschenko Sep 6, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @sivaschenko, thank you for the review.
ENGCOM-8147 has been created to process this Pull Request

@engcom-Bravo
Copy link
Contributor

✔️ QA Passed

The Default view doesn't contain any bookmarks, it is empty as expected

Manual testing scenario - https://studio.cucumber.io/projects/131313/test-plan/folders/1320712/scenarios/5115557

@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo moved this from Ready for Testing to Testing in Progress in Pull Requests Dashboard Sep 8, 2020
@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo moved this from Testing in Progress to Extended Testing (optional) in Pull Requests Dashboard Sep 8, 2020
@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo added the QA: Added to Regression Scope Scenario was analysed and added to Regression Testing Scope label Sep 8, 2020
@sivaschenko sivaschenko moved this from Extended Testing (optional) to Merge in Progress in Pull Requests Dashboard Sep 8, 2020
@sivaschenko
Copy link
Member

Already merged to 2.4.1-develop.

magento-engcom-team pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team merged commit 85803fd into magento:2.4-develop Sep 9, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 9, 2020

Hi @Nazar65, thank you for your contribution!
Please, complete Contribution Survey, it will take less than a minute.
Your feedback will help us to improve contribution process.

@ghost ghost moved this from Merge in Progress to Recently Merged in Pull Requests Dashboard Sep 9, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Frontend Auto-Tests: Covered All changes in Pull Request is covered by auto-tests Component: Ui Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: accept Project: ASI QA: Added to Regression Scope Scenario was analysed and added to Regression Testing Scope Release Line: 2.4 Severity: S2 Major restrictions or short-term circumventions are required until a fix is available.
Projects
Pull Requests Dashboard
  
Recently Merged
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Bookmark saves filter from url-applier component to default view in some cases
7 participants