-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix webapi returns variables in JSON using snake case and I need came… #31001
Open
jayankaghosh
wants to merge
4
commits into
magento:2.4-develop
Choose a base branch
from
jayankaghosh:issue/24681
base: 2.4-develop
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+27
−2
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6ae193d
Fix webapi returns variables in JSON using snake case and I need came…
jayankaghosh f2bdb50
Change mapObjectKey to private
jayankaghosh f6d4cbe
Encapsulate ltrim inside getKeyByObjectType function
jayankaghosh 5fef144
Encapsulate ltrim inside getKeyByObjectType function
jayankaghosh File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we move ltrim inside the mapObjectKey method?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We could. But that wouldn't make any difference to the flow right? The
mapObjectKey
should only be responsible for mapping the object keys. Which is why I had kept theltrim
(to include any class names with preceding slashes given in the di.xml as well) outside of itThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The issue with it that it might not find the correct key, if in the client code we'll not do ltrim.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think I understand. The
mapObjectKey
can't be called from any other class. It'll just be called from thebuildOutputDataArray
function, and we have done theltrim
thereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. but in case if someone will adjust this code a bit later or will call it in the another method - this issue will appear. It's better to incapsulate this logic inside the method
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I see. Okay. In that case I think it's better that we name the function something other than
mapObjectKey
?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
getKeyByObjectType?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Guess that'll work