Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Monica - Feedback #4

Closed
mebonill opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

Monica - Feedback #4

mebonill opened this issue Feb 20, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@mebonill
Copy link
Collaborator

WBS Document:
Delegates tasks in a temporal manner with actionable items. The tasks are split into activities that are feasible and accomplishable.
Makes use of multiple packages ( SCENIC, RSHINY, BITFAM, Dorothea)
Details the output of each analysis with use friendliness in mind
Data visualizations are also taken into account
Comment: Workflow is clear and concise, activities are split into manageable tasks.

Materials:
Working with scRNA-Seq data, specifically 4 datasets ( breast cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer).
Three different software requirement specification documents. Document SRS doc 3 is the most detailed document, introducing the software package and its utilization for a user.

Comments:
Very well thought out project, WBS document and SDS documents are informative and clear.

I recommend making a single document consisting of the necessary inputs for all the different packages you will run and their outputs. This will enable the user to identify different data types necessary to use your package and ascertain what outputs they will be comparing. This is a small detail but one page takeaway might help the user feel prepared to begin analysis if they can check what they need.
Progress has been made on subsetting the data, writing a function and testing that it works.
Are there transcription that are known to be dysregulated across all cancers (cancer agnostic) and some that specific to each cancer you are investigating? Very cool to test the accuracy of the different trancription inference programs and converge on the output that is the same across programs ( computational). From a biology perspective are you able to identify a transcription factor network that is common in all 4 cancer datasets you are utilizing ( a cancer transcription factor network signature ?) Potentially look into Chip-Seq data as a validation step of findings?

Code and Test File:
R code reading in data, normalization of data, initial run of BITFAM
Test Code: Checking raw counts of scRNA-seq is present and that normalization of data was performe
)

  • The goals of this project can be achieved and progress has been made :)
@MahnoorNGondal
Copy link
Owner

Thank you for your comment
The software specification document is updated to version 4 and recommendations added in section 1.2.1 ae11648

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants