New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add section scope #1499

Open

williballenthin opened this issue May 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Collaborator

williballenthin commented May 30, 2023 •

edited

Loading

needs agreement that we should move forward with this idea (see #1401 for background). don't move forward on this until we all agree.

pro: more things we can match on
con: more things to maintain, especially with many extractors

williballenthin mentioned this issue

add section scope features #1500

Open

Collaborator Author

williballenthin commented May 30, 2023

notably, implementing this scope before doing dynamic scope might be good practice @yelhamer

williballenthin mentioned this issue

performance issues with some samples #1989

Open

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment