Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSFragger / FragPipe integration #23

Closed
hcadre opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 8 comments · Fixed by #25
Closed

MSFragger / FragPipe integration #23

hcadre opened this issue Aug 19, 2021 · 8 comments · Fixed by #25
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@hcadre
Copy link

hcadre commented Aug 19, 2021

It would be very helpful to also have the possibility to upload results from a search performed with FragPipe (combined_peptide.tsv?).
Thank you for this tool!

@ibludau
Copy link
Collaborator

ibludau commented Aug 19, 2021

Thanks for the suggestion to include FragPipe output.
We're still expanding on the input formats and can certainly aim to incorporate that for the next release!

@hcadre
Copy link
Author

hcadre commented Aug 19, 2021

Purrfect! Thanks!

@ibludau
Copy link
Collaborator

ibludau commented Aug 26, 2021

Hey, could you maybe share an example combined_peptide.tsv with us so we can look into the integration? We would only need a handful of proteins including some PTMs.

@hcadre
Copy link
Author

hcadre commented Aug 27, 2021

Enclosed, please find excerpts from the combined_peptide.tsv as well as from the combined_protein.tsv files. Hope this helps!
combined_protein_alphamap.txt
combined_peptide_alphamap.txt

@ibludau
Copy link
Collaborator

ibludau commented Aug 27, 2021

Thanks a lot for providing the example files. I realised that the site positions of observed PTMs are not annotated in the sequence. Is there an additional output file that contains this information? Otherwise AlphaMap cannot show them.

@hcadre
Copy link
Author

hcadre commented Aug 27, 2021

Oh yes, I should have known better: Unfortunately, FragPipe / MSFRagger currently does not provide PTM positional information on the protein level. According to Alexey Nesvizhskii this is due to Philosopher, which does not generate site-level reports and that there is a need for parsers / tools that would do the job. Fragpipe however generates a peptide.tsv file per each raw file, which contains information about the position of a PTM relative to the sequence of the peptide, in which the PTM is present. But that would not help a lot, would it? I attach an example anyway.
peptide_alphamap.txt

@ibludau
Copy link
Collaborator

ibludau commented Aug 27, 2021

This table actually contains the necessary information, but this means that you could only upload single runs at a time I assume? That is slightly suboptimal.
Options are therefore the following:

  1. enable combined_peptide.tsv as input format and ​and neglect PTM information at this point
  2. enable the peptide.tsv file import for individual runs including PTM information (but being limited to a single run per trace)

Do you have a preference for your applications?

@EugeniaVoytik EugeniaVoytik self-assigned this Aug 30, 2021
@EugeniaVoytik EugeniaVoytik added the enhancement New feature or request label Aug 30, 2021
@EugeniaVoytik EugeniaVoytik linked a pull request Sep 1, 2021 that will close this issue
@EugeniaVoytik
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for suggesting this feature! We've integrated two options that Isabell mentioned in the previous comment. You may read more about it in the instructions for the import of FragPipe output files in AlphaMap in GUI directly or in the README.md file.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants