-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
/
dul-sp-en.rdf
4098 lines (3183 loc) · 296 KB
/
dul-sp-en.rdf
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
789
790
791
792
793
794
795
796
797
798
799
800
801
802
803
804
805
806
807
808
809
810
811
812
813
814
815
816
817
818
819
820
821
822
823
824
825
826
827
828
829
830
831
832
833
834
835
836
837
838
839
840
841
842
843
844
845
846
847
848
849
850
851
852
853
854
855
856
857
858
859
860
861
862
863
864
865
866
867
868
869
870
871
872
873
874
875
876
877
878
879
880
881
882
883
884
885
886
887
888
889
890
891
892
893
894
895
896
897
898
899
900
901
902
903
904
905
906
907
908
909
910
911
912
913
914
915
916
917
918
919
920
921
922
923
924
925
926
927
928
929
930
931
932
933
934
935
936
937
938
939
940
941
942
943
944
945
946
947
948
949
950
951
952
953
954
955
956
957
958
959
960
961
962
963
964
965
966
967
968
969
970
971
972
973
974
975
976
977
978
979
980
981
982
983
984
985
986
987
988
989
990
991
992
993
994
995
996
997
998
999
1000
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#"
xml:base="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"
xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
xmlns:terms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
xmlns:owl="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#"
xmlns:ns="http://creativecommons.org/ns#"
xmlns:xml="http://www.w3.org/XML/1998/namespace"
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#"
xmlns:rdfs="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<owl:Ontology rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es">
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Agradecimiento: a María Poveda-Villalón por la generación de la documentación en HTML.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Acknowledgement: María Poveda-Villalón by the generation of the HTML documentation.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The DOLCE+DnS Ultralite ontology.
It is a simplification of some parts of the DOLCE Lite-Plus library (cf. https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/DLP3941_daml.html).
Main aspects in which DOLCE+DnS Ultralite departs from DOLCE Lite-Plus are the following:
- The names of classes and relations have been made more intuitive
- The DnS-related part is closer to the newer 'constructive DnS' ontology (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/cDnS.owl).
- Temporal and spatial relations are simplified
- Qualities and regions are more relaxed than in DOLCE-Full: they can be used as attributes of any entity, although two axioms state that each quality has a region and viceversa
- Axiomatization makes use of simpler constructs than DOLCE Lite-Plus
- The architecture of the ontology is pattern-based, which means that DOLCE+DnS Ultralite is also available in modules, called 'content ontology design patterns', which can be applied independently in the design of domain ontologies (cf. http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org). If many modules are needed in a same ontology project, it is anyway useful to use this integrated version.
The final result is a lightweight, easy-to-apply foundational ontology for modeling either physical or social contexts.
Several extensions of DOLCE+DnS Ultralite have been designed; see for example the extensions for information objects: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/IOLite.owl,
for systems: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/SystemsLite.owl,
for plans: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/PlansLite.owl,
and for the lexical and semiotic domains: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/lmm/LMM_L2.owl, etc.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">La ontología DOLCE+DnS Ultralite.
Es una simplificación de algunas partes de la biblioteca DOLCE Lite-Plus (cf. https://www.w3.org/2001/sw/BestPractices/WNET/DLP3941_daml.html).
Los principales aspectos en los cuales DOLCE+DnS Ultralite se diferencia de DOLCE Lite-Plus son los siguientes:
- Los nombres de las clases y de las relaciones se han hecho más intuitivos.
- La parte relacionada con DnS es más cercana a la ontología constructiva DnS más nueva (http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/cDnS.owl).
- Las relaciones temporales y espaciales se han simplificado.
- Las cualidades y las regiones son ahora más relajadas que en DOLCE-Full: ahora se pueden utilizar como atributos de cualquier entidad, aunque hay dos axiomas que establecen que cada cualidad tiene una región y viceversa.
- La axiomatización hace uso de contructos más simples que los de DOLCE Lite-Plus.
- La arquitectura de la ontología está basada en patrones, llamados patrones de contenido de diseño de ontologías, que pueden ser aplicados independientemente en el diseño de ontologías de dominio (cf. http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org). Esto significa que DOLCE+DnS Ultralite también está disponible por módulos, Si se necesitan muchos módulos en un mismo proyecto de ontologías, es, en cualquier caso, útil utilizar esta versión integrada.
El resultado final es una ontología general, ligera y fácil de aplicar tanto para contextos físicos como sociales.
Se han diseñado varias extensiones de DOLCE+DnS Ultralite; véase, por ejemplo, la extensión para objetos de información: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/IOLite.owl,para sistemas: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/SystemsLite.owl, para planes: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/PlansLite.owl,, y para el dominio léxico y semiótico: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/lmm/LMM_L2.owl, etc.</rdfs:comment>
<owl:versionInfo xml:lang="es">Created by Aldo Gangemi as both a simplification and extension of DOLCE and Descriptions and Situations ontologies.
The translation into Spanish has been carried out by Mariano Fernández-López</owl:versionInfo>
<dc:title xml:lang="en">The ontology DOLCE+DnS Ultralite</dc:title>
<terms:license rdf:resource="http://purl.org/NET/rdflicense/cc-by4.0"/>
<owl:versionInfo rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">4.0</owl:versionInfo>
<owl:versionInfo xml:lang="es">En 3.2, los enlaces entre las instancias de ‘región’ o ‘parámetro’ y sus tipos de datos han sido revisados y hecho más potentes, con el propósito de respaldar patrones de diseño para valores de datos que se modelan en OWL 1.0.
También, los nombres de las propiedades relacionadas han sido cambiados para hacerlos más intuitivos. Asimismo, se ha añadido un campo de comentario de gran tamaño a la propiedad de objeto ‘expresa’, con el propósito de clarificar algunas cuestiones sobre sus muchas interpretaciones.
En 3.3, se ha mejorado la relación entre regiones, parámetros, y tipos de datos.
En 3.5, se han refactorizado las clases relacionadas con personas: ‘persona’ en 3.4 es ahora ‘persona social’, para evitar la confusión con la intuición de sentido común; ‘persona’ es ahora la unión de personas sociales y humanos, siendo, por tanto, subclase de ‘agente’.
En 3.6, se han realizado otras correcciones sobre la restricción universal que involucra ‘expresa’. También se ha añadido la propiedad ‘es restricción de’ entre parámetros y entidades. Se han movido propiedades ‘asume’ y ‘adopta’ a un nuevo módulo: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/Conceptualization.owl.
En 3,7, se han corregido algunos nombres de clases y propiedades relacionados con ‘entidad formal’; se ha creado un nuevo módulo separado para restricciones universales generales (DULGCI.owl).
En 3.8, se han realizado más correcciones en la interfaz con las entidades formales y los enlaces a IOLite.owl.
En 3.9, se han corregido algunos nombres y comentarios.
En 3.10, se ha eliminado la restricción de cardinalidad de ‘tiene parte’ y ‘es parte de’, para que haya compatibilidad con OWL(DL). Además, éstas relaciones se han cambiado a ‘tiene componente’ y ‘es componente de’. También se ha aumentado el rango de ‘incluye agente’ para contener tanto agentes físicos como sociales, y de la restricción universal de ‘conceptualiza’ sobre ‘agentes’, para incluir todos los objetos sociales.
En 3.11, se ha introducido algún axioma más subpropiedad, y todos los elementos tienen etiqueta en inglés.
En 3.12, se han añadido clases para establecer correspondencias con algunas clases antiguas que habían sido utilizadas para el alineamiento con OntoWordNet.
En 3.13, se ha añadido la clase ‘concepto local’ para expresar un concepto que no se puede utilizar en una ‘descripción’ diferente de la que lo define. También se han actualizado algunos comentarios.
En 3.14, se han añadido algunos comentarios.
En 3.15, se han eliminado algunos axiomas owl:disjointWith que relacionan ‘colección’ con ‘objeto de información’, ‘descripción’, ‘situación’, y ‘agente social’. La razón para hacer esto ha sido permitir restricciones menos estrictas sobre las relaciones de dominio que involucran colecciones que se puede concebir como descripciones, situaciones, agentes sociales, u objetos de información; por ejemplo: una colección de oraciones de un texto (un objeto de información) que están ordenadas según un criterio de relevancia que se puede considerar todavía un texto.
En 3.16, el nombre de ‘es actuado por’ se ha cambiado por ‘actúa a través de’, que es más claro. También se ha añadido ‘región espacio temporal’ constituida por ‘región espacial’ e ‘intervalo de tiempo’.
En 3.17, se han eliminado los axiomas universales redundantes de ‘entidad’ y otras clases generales. Se han corregido, asimismo, restricciones sobre la clase ‘sustancia funcional’, así como los comentarios en las clases ‘diseño’ y ‘sustancia’.
En 3.18, se ha eliminado el axioma subClassOf entre ‘sustancia funcional’ y ‘artefacto diseñado’, se ha creado una nueva sublcase de ‘sustancia funcional’, llamada ‘sustancia diseñada’, y se ha creado un axioma subClassOf entre ‘sustancia diseñada’ y ‘artefacto diseñado’.
En 3.19, se ha eliminado el axioma de disyunción entre ‘concepto’ y ‘colección' (por la misma razón que se ha explicado en la versión 3.15).
En 3.20, se ha revisado el comentario de ‘cualidad’, se ha añadido ‘entidad de información’ como superclase de ‘objeto de información’ y ‘materialización de información’ (representada como la unión de estas clases). Esto es necesario en muchas ontologías de dominio que no necesitan distinguir entre los aspectos concretos y abstractos de las entidades de información. Una posible revisión (no implementada aquí) sería introducir las relaciones: ‘expresa’ y ‘es sobre’ con un dominio más amplio: ‘entidad de información’, y dos propiedades más específicas: ‘expresa abstractamente’ y ‘es abstractamente sobre’. Esta última versión no ha sido implementada todavía, puesto que un habría que llevarse a cabo un largo proceso de revisión para comprobar el impacto de la revisión sobre los plugins de DOLCE-DnS-Ultralite existentes.
En 3.21, se ha añadido un comentario a ‘entidad de información’, y se ha optimizado la representación de la equivalencia de ‘realización de información’.
En 3.22., se ha añadido un comentario a ‘personificación’.
En 3.23, se ha añadido la propiedad de objeto ‘asociado con’, y se han puesto todas las propiedades de objeto como subpropiedades suyas.
En 3.24, se ha eliminado la propiedad de tipo de datos ‘tiene proxy’.
En 3.25, se ha generalizado el dominio y el rango de ‘tiene componente’ y ‘es componente de’.
En 3.26, se han actualizado algunos comentarios para clarificar o ejemplificar los conceptos.
En 3.27, se ha añadido la anotación rdfs:isDefinedBy para navegadores de datos enlazados.
En 3.28, se ha ampliado el universo de pre-/pos-condiciones para dar cabida a eventos y estados.
En 3.29, se han añadido algunas propiedades para proporcionar soporte al alineamiento de Dbpedia: ‘el mismo escenario que’ (circunstancial análogo a coparticipación), incluyendo relaciones de proveniencia, por ejemplo, de parentesco compartido, propiedad, o relaciones en que se juega algún papel.
En 3.30, se han completado algunos dominios y rangos (anteriormente, owl:Thing, now dul:Entity), y se ha añadido el axioma ‘organismo’ subClassOf ‘agente físico’.
En 3.31, se ha añadido una restricción a ‘cualidad’ y otra a ‘región’ para asegurar que la restricción original de DOLCE de cualidades está siempre asociada con una región, y viceversa. Estos axiomas no excluyen, sin embargo, una aplicabilidad directa de cualidades o regiones obre cualquier otra entidad.
En 3.4, el módulo principal de la ontología se ha traducido al español.</owl:versionInfo>
<dc:title xml:lang="es">La ontología DOLCE+DnS Ultralite</dc:title>
<terms:creator xml:lang="es">Aldo Gangemi</terms:creator>
<terms:contributor xml:lang="es">Mariano Fernández-López (traducción al español)</terms:contributor>
<owl:versionInfo xml:lang="en">In 3.2, the links between instances of Region or Parameter, and datatypes have been revised and made more powerful, in order to support efficient design patterns for data value modelling in OWL1.0.
Also, the names of the related properties have been changed in order to make them more intuitive.
Furthermore, a large comment field has been added to the 'expresses' object property, in order to clarify some issues about the many interpretations.
In 3.3, the relation between regions, parameters, and datatypes has been still improved.
In 3.5, the person-related classes have been refactored: Person in 3.4 is now SocialPerson, to avoid confusion with commonsense intuition; Person is now the union of social persons and humans, therefore being a subclass of Agent.
In 3.6, other fixes on universal restriction involving expresses. Also added the property 'isConstraintFor' between parameters and entities. Moved the properties: 'assumes' and 'adopts' to the new module: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/Conceptualization.owl.
In 3.7, some fixes on the names of classes and properties related to FormalEntity; created a new separate module for general universal restrictions (DULGCI.owl).
In 3.8, more fixes on the interface to formal entities and links to IOLite.owl.
In 3.9, some naming and comment fixes.
In 3.10, removed cardinality restriction from hasPart and isPartOf restrictions (changed to hasComponent and isComponentOf), for OWL(DL) compatibility. Also enlarged the range of includesAgent to contain both social and physical agents, and of conceptualizes universal restriction on agents, to include all social objects.
In 3.11, some more subproperty axioms have been introduced, and all elements have got English labels.
In 3.12, added some classes to map some old DolceLitePlus classes that were used to align OntoWordNet.
In 3.13, added the LocalConcept class to express a Concept that cannot be used in a Description different from the one that defines it. Also updated some comments.
In 3.14, added some comments.
In 3.15, removed some owl:disjointWith axioms relating Collection to InformationObject, Description, Situation, and SocialAgent. The rationale for doing that is to allow less strict constraints on domain relations involving collections that can be also conceived as descriptions, situations, social agents, or information objects; for example: a collection of sentences from a text (an information object) that are ranked with a relevance criterion can be still considered a text.
In 3.16, name of isActedBy changed to actsThrough, which is clearer. Also added SpatioTemporalRegion as constituted by a SpaceRegion and a TimeInterval.
In 3.17, removed redundant universal axioms from Entity and other top classes. Fixed restrictions on FunctionalSubstance class, and comments in Design and Substance classes.
In 3.18, removed subClassOf axiom from FunctionalSubstance to DesignedArtifact, created a new subclass of FunctionalSubstance, called DesignedSubstance, and created a subClassOf axiom from DesignedSubstance to DesignedArtifact.
In 3.19, removed disjointness axiom between Concept and Collection (the same rationale applies as in 3.15 version.
In 3.20, revised the comment for Quality, added InformationEntity as the superclass for InformationObject and InformationRealization (represented as the union of those classes). This is needed in many domain ontologies that do not need to distinguish between abstract and concrete aspects of information entities. One possible revision (not implemented here) would be to introduce the relations: expresses and isAbout with a broader domain:InformationEntity, and two more specific properties: abstractlyExpresses and isAbstractlyAbout. This last revision has not been implemented yet, since a large revision procedure should be carried out in order to check the impact of the revision on the existing DOLCE-DnS-Ultralite plugins.
In 3.21, added comment to InformationEntity, and optimized representation of equivalence for InformationRealization.
In 3.22, added comment to Personification.
In 3.23, added associatedWith object property, and put all object properties as subproperties of it.
In 3.24, removed hasProxy datatype property.
In 3.25, generalized domain and range of hasComponent and isComponentOf.
In 3.26, updated some comments in order to clarify or exemplify the concepts.
In 3.27, added rdfs:isDefinedBy annotations for Linked Data browsers.
In 3.28, broadened the universe of pre-/post-conditions to give room to events and states.
In 3.29, added some properties to support DBpedia alignment: sameSettingAs (situational analogous to coparticipation), including relations originating e.g. from sharing kinship, ownership, or roleplaying situations.
In 3.30, completed some domains and ranges (formerly owl:Thing, now dul:Entity), and added axiom: Organism subClassOf PhysicalAgent.
In 3.31, added a restriction to Quality and one to Region in order to ensure the original DOLCE constraint of qualities being always associated with a region, and vice versa. These axioms do not however exclude a direct applicability of qualities or regions to any other entity.
In 3.4 the main module of the ontology has been translated into Spanish.</owl:versionInfo>
</owl:Ontology>
<!--
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// Annotation properties
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-->
<!-- http://creativecommons.org/ns#license -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/ns#license"/>
<!-- http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/title"/>
<!-- http://purl.org/dc/terms/contributor -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/terms/contributor"/>
<!-- http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator"/>
<!-- http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment"/>
<!-- http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#label"/>
<!-- http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo -->
<owl:AnnotationProperty rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#versionInfo"/>
<!--
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// Datatypes
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-->
<!-- http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date -->
<rdfs:Datatype rdf:about="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#date"/>
<!--
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
//
// Object Properties
//
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-->
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#actsFor -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#actsFor">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#actsThrough"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Agent"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#SocialAgent"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">La relación que tiene lugar entre cualquier ‘agente’ y un ‘agente social’. En principio, un ‘agente social’ requiere al menos un ‘agente físico’ para actuar, pero esta dependencia puede ser delegada, así, por ejemplo, un departamento puede actuar para una universidad y, a su vez, un agente físico puede actuar para el departamento.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The relation holding between any Agent, and a SocialAgent. In principle, a SocialAgent requires at least one PhysicalAgent in order to act, but this dependency can be 'delegated'; e.g. a university can be acted for by a department, which on its turm is acted for by physical agents.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">acts for</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">actúa para</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">agisce per</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#actsThrough -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#actsThrough">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#SocialAgent"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Agent"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">La relación inversa de 'actúa para'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The relation holding between a PhysicalAgent and a SocialAgent. In principle, a SocialAgent requires at least one PhysicalAgent in order to act, but this dependency can be 'delegated', e.g. a university can be acted for by a department, which is acted for by physical agents. AKA isActedBy</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">acts through</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">actúa a través de</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">agisce mediante</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith">
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#SymmetricProperty"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#TransitiveProperty"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A catch-all object property, useful for alignment and querying purposes.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una propiedad de objeto multifunción, útil para fines de alineación y consulta.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">asociado con</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label>associatedWith</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#characterizes -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#characterizes">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isCharacterizedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Concept"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Collection"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between concepts and collections, where a Concept is said to characterize a Collection; it corresponds to a link between the (reified) intensional and extensional interpretations of a _proper subset of_ a (reified) class. This is different from covers, because it refers to an interpretation the entire reified class.
E.g. the collection of vintage saxophones is characterized by the Concept 'manufactured by hand', while it gets covered by the Concept 'Saxophone' with the Parameter 'Vintage'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre conceptos y colecciones, donde un ‘concepto’ se dice que caracteriza una ‘colección’. Corresponde a un enlace entre representaciones extensionales e intensionales (reificadas) de un_subconjunto_propio_de_una clase (reificada). Es diferente de ‘cubre’, porque se refiere a una interpretación de la clase entera reificada. Por ejemplo, la colección de saxofones de época está caracterizada por el ‘concepto’ Hecho a Mano, mientras que está cubierta por el ‘concepto’ Saxofón, con el parámetro De Época.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">caracteriza</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">caratterizza</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">characterizes</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#classifies -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#classifies">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isClassifiedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Concept"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between a Concept and an Entity, e.g. the Role 'student' classifies a Person 'John'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre un ‘concepto’ y una ‘entidad’, por ejemplo, el ‘papel’ estudiante clasifica una persona.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">clasifica</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">classifica</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">classifies</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#conceptualizes -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#conceptualizes">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isConceptualizedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Agent"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#SocialObject"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation stating that an Agent is internally representing a SocialObject: situations, descriptions, concepts, etc. E.g., 'John believes in the conspiracy theory'; 'Niels Bohr created the solar-system metaphor for the atomic theory'; 'Jacques assumes all swans are white'; 'the task force members share the attack plan'.
Conceptualizations can be distinguished into different forms, primarily based on the type of SocialObject that is conceptualized. Descriptions and concepts can be 'assumed', situations can be 'believed' or 'known', plans can be 'adopted', etc. (see ontology: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/Conceptualization.owl.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación que establece que un ‘agente’ está representando internamente un ‘objeto social’: situaciones, descripciones, conceptos, etc. Por ejemplo, “John cree en la teoría de la conspiración”; “Niels Bohr creó la metáfora del sistema solar para la teoría atómica”; “Diego asume que los cisnes son blancos”; “los miembros del cuerpo especial comparten el plan de ataque”. Se pueden distinguir las conceptualizaciones de diferentes maneras, primariamente basadas en el tipo de ‘objeto social’ que es conceptualizado. Las descripciones y los conceptos pueden ser “asumidos”; las situaciones pueden ser “creíadas” o “conocidas”, los planes puede ser “adoptados”, etc. (Véase la ontología http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/Conceptualization.owl).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">conceptualiza</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">conceptualizes</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">concettualizza</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#concretelyExpresses -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#concretelyExpresses">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isConcretelyExpressedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#InformationRealization"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#SocialObject"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between an InformationRealization and a Description, e.g. 'the printout of the Italian Constitution concretelyExpresses the Italian Constitution'. It should be supplied also with a rule stating that the InformationRealization realizes an InformationObject that expresses the Description</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre una ‘realización de información’ y una ‘descripción’, por ejemplo, la Constitución Española impresa ‘concretamente expresa’ la Constitución Española. Se debería proporcionar también una regla que estableciera que una ‘realización de información’ realiza un ‘objeto de información’ que expresa la ‘descripción’.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">concretely expresses</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">esprime concretamente</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">expresa concretamente</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#coparticipatesWith -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#coparticipatesWith">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#coparticipatesWith"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#SymmetricProperty"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Object"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Object"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between two objects participating in a same Event; e.g., 'Vitas and Jimmy are playing tennis'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre dos objetos que participan en el mismo ‘evento’; por ejemplo, “Carlos y Juan están jugando al tenis”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">co-participa con</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">co-participates with</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">copartecipa con</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#covers -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#covers">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isCoveredBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Concept"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Collection"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between concepts and collections, where a Concept is said to cover a Collection; it corresponds to a link between the (reified) intensional and extensional interpretations of a (reified) class.
E.g. the collection of vintage saxophones is covered by the Concept 'Saxophone' with the Parameter 'Vintage'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre conceptos y colecciones, donde un ‘concepto’ se dice que cubre una colección; se corresponde con un enlace entre las interpretaciones extensional e intensional (reificada) de una clase (reificada). Por ejemplo, la colección de saxofones de época está cubierta por el ‘concepto’ Saxofón con el parámetro De Época.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">covers</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">cubre</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ricopre</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#defines -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#defines">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#usesConcept"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isDefinedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Description"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Concept"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between a Description and a Concept, e.g. a Workflow for a governmental Organization defines the Role 'officer', or 'the Italian Traffic Law defines the role Vehicle'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre una ‘descripción’ y un ‘concepto’, por ejemplo, un ‘flujo de trabajo’ para una ‘organización’ gubernamental define el papel “policía”, o la Ley de Tráfico de España define el papel Vehículo.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">define</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">defines</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">definisce</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#definesRole -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#definesRole">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#defines"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isRoleDefinedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Description"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Role"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between a description and a role, e.g. the recipe for a cake defines the role 'ingredient'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre una descripción y un papel, por ejemplo, la receta para un pastel define el papel “ingrediente”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">define papel</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">defines role</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">definisce il ruolo</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#definesTask -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#definesTask">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#defines"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isTaskDefinedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Description"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Task"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between a description and a task, e.g. the recipe for a cake defines the task 'boil'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre una descripción y una tarea, por ejemplo, la receta para un pastel define la tarea.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">define tarea</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">defines task</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">definisce il task</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#describes -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#describes">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isDescribedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Description"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The relation between a Description and an Entity : a Description gives a unity to a Collection of parts (the components), or constituents, by assigning a Role to each of them in the context of a whole Object (the system).
A same Entity can be given different descriptions, for example, an old cradle can be given a unifying Description based on the original aesthetic design, the functionality it was built for, or a new aesthetic functionality in which it can be used as a flower pot.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre una ‘descripción’ y una ‘entidad’: una ‘descripción’ proporciona unidad a una ‘colección’ de partes (los componentes), o constituyentes, asignando un papel a cada uno de ellos en el contexto de un ‘objeto’ en su totalidad (el sistema). A una misma entidad se le pueden dar diferentes descripciones, por ejemplo, a una vieja cuna se le puede dar una ‘descripción’ que unifica basada en el diseño estético original, la funcionalidad para la que fue construida, o una nueva funcionalidad estética en la que se pude utilizar como maceta con flores.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">describe</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">describes</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">descrive</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyFollows -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyFollows">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#follows"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyPrecedes"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Sub-relación intransitiva de “sigue”. Por ejemplo, el miércoles precede directamente al jueves. El que la precedencia sea directa depende de la conceptualización del diseñador.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The intransitive follows relation. For example, Wednesday directly precedes Thursday. Directness of precedence depends on the designer conceptualization.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">directly follows</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">segue direttamente</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">sigue directamente</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyPrecedes -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyPrecedes">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#precedes"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">La relación intransitiva “precede”. Por ejemplo, el miércoles precede directamente al jueves. El que la precedencia sea directa depende de la conceptualización del diseñador.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The intransitive precedes relation. For example, Monday directly precedes Tuesday. Directness of precedence depends on the designer conceptualization.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">directly precedes</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">precede directamente</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">precede direttamente</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#executesTask -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#executesTask">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isClassifiedBy"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isExecutedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Action"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Task"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between an action and a task, e.g. 'putting some water in a pot and putting the pot on a fire until the water starts bubbling' executes the task 'boiling'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre una acción y una tarea, por ejemplo, ejecuta la tarea “hervir”</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">ejecuta tarea</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">esegue il task</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">executes task</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expands -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expands">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isRelatedToDescription"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isExpandedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Description"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Description"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A partial order relation that holds between descriptions. It represents the proper part relation between a description and another description featuring the same properties as the former, with at least one additional one.
Descriptions can be expanded either by adding other descriptions as parts, or by refining concepts that are used by them.
An 'intention' to expand must be present (unless purely formal theories are considered, but even in this case a criterion of relevance is usually active).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación de orden parcial que se establece entre descripciones. Representa la relación parte propia entre una descripción y otra descripción que presenta las mismas propiedades que la anterior, con al menos una propiedad adicional. Las descripciones se pueden expandir añadiendo otras descripciones como partes, y también refinando conceptos.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">espande</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">expande</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">expands</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expresses -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expresses">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isExpressedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#InformationObject"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#SocialObject"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between an InformationObject and a 'meaning', generalized here as a 'SocialObject'. For example: 'A Beehive is a structure in which bees are kept, typically in the form of a dome or box.' (Oxford dictionary)'; 'the term Beehive expresses the concept Beehive in my apiculture ontology'.
The intuition for 'meaning' is intended to be very broad. A separate, large comment is included for those who want to investigate more on what kind of meaning can be represented in what form.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment rdf:datatype="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#string">This is a large comment field for those who want to investigate the different uses of the 'expresses' relation for modeling different approaches to meaning characterization and modeling.
For example, in all these cases, some aspect of meaning is involved:
- Beehive means "a structure in which bees are kept, typically in the form of a dome or box." (Oxford dictionary)
- 'Beehive' is a synonym in noun synset 09218159 "beehive|hive" (WordNet)
- 'the term Beehive can be interpreted as the fact of 'being a beehive', i.e. a relation that holds for concepts such as Bee, Honey, Hosting, etc.'
- 'the text of Italian apiculture regulation expresses a rule by which beehives should be kept at least one kilometer away from inhabited areas'
- 'the term Beehive expresses the concept Beehive'
- ''Beehive' for apiculturists does not express the same meaning as for, say, fishermen'
- 'Your meaning of 'Beautiful' does not seem to fit mine'
- ''Beehive' is formally interpreted as the set of all beehives'
- 'from the term 'Beehive', we can build a vector space of statistically significant cooccurring terms in the documents that contain it'
- the lexeme 'Belly' expresses the role 'Body_Part' in the frame 'ObservableBodyParts' (FrameNet)
As the examples suggest, the 'meaning of meaning' is dependent on the background approach/theory that one assumes. One can hardly make a summary of the too many approaches and theories of meaning, therefore this relation is maybe the most controversial and difficult to explain; normally, in such cases it would be better to give up formalizing.
However, the usefulness of having a 'semantic abstraction' in modeling information objects is so high (e.g. for the semantic web, interoperability, reengineering, etc.), that we accept this challenging task, although without taking any particular position in the debate.
We provide here some examples, which we want to generalize upon when using the 'expresses' relation to model semantic aspects of social reality.
In the most common approach, lexicographers that write dictionaries, glossaries, etc. assume that the meaning of a term is a paraphrase (or 'gloss', or 'definition').
Another approach is provided by concept schemes like thesauri and lexicons, which assume that the meaning of a term is a 'concept', encoded as a 'lemma', 'synset', or 'descriptor'.
Still another approach is that of psychologists and cognitive scientists, which often assume that the meaning of an information object is a concept encoded in the mind or cognitive system of an agent.
A radically different approach is taken by social scientists and semioticians, who usually assume that meanings of an information object are spread across the communication practices in which members of a community use that object.
Another approach that tackles the distributed nature of meaning is assumed by geometrical models of semantics, which assume that the meaning of an InformationObject (e.g. a word) results from the set of informational contexts (e.g. within texts) in which that object is used similarly.
The logical approach to meaning is still different, since it assumes that the meaning of e.g. a term is equivalent to the set of individuals that the term can be applied to; for example, the meaning of 'Ali' is e.g. an individual person called Ali, the meaning of 'Airplane' is e.g. the set of airplanes, etc.
Finally, an approach taken by structuralist linguistics and frame semantics is that a meaning is the relational context in which an information object can be applied; for example, a meaning of 'Airplane' is situated e.g. in the context ('frame') of passenger airline flights.
These different approaches are not necessarily conflicting, and they mostly talk about different aspects of so-called 'semantics'. They can be summarized and modelled within DOLCE-Ultralite as follows (notice that such list is far from exhaustive):
(1) Informal meaning (as for linguistic or commonsense semantics: a distinction is assumed between (informal) meaning and reference; see isAbout for an alternative pattern on reference)
- Paraphrase meaning (as for lexicographic semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between instances of InformationObject and different instances of InformationObject that act as 'paraphrases'
- Conceptual meaning (as for 'concept scheme' semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between instances of InformationObject and instances of Concept
- Relational meaning (as for frame semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between instances of InformationObject and instances of Description
- Cognitive meaning (as for 'psychological' semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between any instance of InformationObject and any different instance of InformationObject that isRealizedBy a mental, cognitive or neural state (depending on which theory of mind is assumed). Such states can be considered here as instances of Process (occurring in the mind, cognitive system, or neural system of an agent)
- Cultural meaning (as for 'social science' semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between instances of InformationObject and instances of SocialObject (institutions, cultural paradigms, norms, social practices, etc.)
- Distributional meaning (as for geometrical models of meaning). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between any instance of InformationObject and any different instance of InformationObject that isFormallyRepresentedIn some (geometrical) Region (e.g. a vector space)
(2) Formal meaning (as for logic and formal semantics: no distinction is assumed between informal meaning and reference, therefore between 'expresses' and 'isAbout', which can be used interchangeably)
- Object-level formal meaning (as in the traditional first-order logic semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between an instance of InformationObject and an instance of Collection that isGroundingFor (in most cases) a Set; isGroundingFor is defined in the ontology: http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/ont/dul/IOLite.owl
- Modal formal meaning (as in possible-world semantics). Here it is modelled as the expresses relation between an instance of InformationObject and an instance of Collection that isGroundingFor a Set, and which isPartOf some different instance of Collection that isGroundingFor a PossibleWorld
This is only a first step to provide a framework, in which one can model different aspects of meaning. A more developed ontology should approach the problem of integrating the different uses of 'expresses', so that different theories, resources, methods can interoperate.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre un ‘objeto de información’ y un “significado”, generalizado aquí como un ‘objeto social’. Por ejemplo, “una colmena es una estructura en la que las abejas se refugian, normalmente en forma cúpula o caja” (Oxford dictionary) expresa el concepto Abeja en mi ontología de apicultura. La intuición para “significado” se asume que es muy amplia. Se proporciona un comentario más amplio de esta relación en inglés.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">esprime</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">expresa</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">expresses</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expressesConcept -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expressesConcept">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#expresses"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isConceptExpressedBy"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#InformationObject"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Concept"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between an InformationObject and a Concept , e.g. the term "dog" expresses the Concept "dog". For expressing a relational meaning, see the more general object property: expresses</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre un ‘objeto de información’ y un ‘concepto’, por ejemplo, el término “perro” expresa el concepto Perro. Para expresar un significado relacional, véase la propiedad de objeto más general ‘expresa’.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">esprime il concetto</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">expresa concepto</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">expresses concept</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#farFrom -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#farFrom">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#farFrom"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#SymmetricProperty"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Generic distance relation between any Entity(s). E.g. Rome is far from Beijing, astronomy is far from necromancy.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Relación genérica de distancia entre entidades cualesquiera. Por ejemplo, Madrid está lejos de Pekín, la astronomía está lejos de la nigromancia.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">está lejos de</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">far from</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#follows -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#follows">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#precedes"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#TransitiveProperty"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between entities, expressing a 'sequence' schema.
E.g. 'year 2000 follows 1999', 'preparing coffee' follows 'deciding what coffee to use', 'II World War follows I World War', etc.
It can be used between tasks, processes or time intervals, and subproperties would fit best in order to distinguish the different uses.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre un entidades, que expresa un esquema de “secuencia”. Por ejemplo, “el año 2000 sigue al 1999”, “preparar un café sigue a decidir qué tipo de café utilizar”, “la II Guerra Mundial sigue a la I Guerra Mundial”, etc. Se puede utilizar entre tareas, procesos o intervalos de tiempo, aunque se recomienda utilizar subpropiedades para matizar mejor los distintos tipos de usos.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">follows</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">segue</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">sigue</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasCommonBoundary -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasCommonBoundary">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasCommonBoundary"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#SymmetricProperty"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation to encode either formal or informal characterizations of 'boundaries' common to two different entities: an Event that ends when another begins, two abstract regions that have a common topological boundary, two objects that are said to be 'in contact' from a commonsense perspective, etc.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación para codificar bien caracterizaciones formales o bien informales de límites comunes a dos entidades diferentes: un ‘evento’ que termina cuando otro empieza, dos regiones abstractas que tienen un límite topológico común, dos objetos que se dice que están “en contacto” desde una perspectiva del sentido común.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has common boundary</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene límite común</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasComponent -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasComponent">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPart"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isComponentOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">La relación ‘tiene parte de’ sin transitividad, que tiene lugar entre un ‘objeto’ (el sistema) y otro (el componente), y asumiendo un ‘diseño’ que estructura el ‘objeto’.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The hasPart relation without transitivity, holding between an Object (the system) and another (the component), and assuming a Design that structures the Object.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha componente</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has component</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene componente</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasConstituent -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasConstituent">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isConstituentOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">'Constituency' depends on some layering of the world described by the ontology. For example, scientific granularities (e.g. body-organ-tissue-cell) or ontological 'strata' (e.g. social-mental-biological-physical) are typical layerings.
Intuitively, a constituent is a part belonging to a lower layer. Since layering is actually a partition of the world described by the ontology, constituents are not properly classified as parts, although this kinship can be intuitive for common sense.
A desirable advantage of this distinction is that we are able to talk e.g. of physical constituents of non-physical objects (e.g. systems), while this is not possible in terms of parts.
Example of are the persons constituting a social system, the molecules constituting a person, the atoms constituting a river, etc.
In all these examples, we notice a typical discontinuity between the constituted and the constituent object: e.g. a social system is conceptualized at a different layer from the persons that constitute it, a person is conceptualized at a different layer from the molecules that constitute them, and a river is conceptualized at a different layer from the atoms that constitute it.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">“Constitución” depende de una estructura por niveles del mundo descrito por una ontología. Por ejemplo, las granularidades científicas (por ejemplo cuerpo-órgano-tejido-célula) o estratos ontológicos (por ejemplo, social-mental-biológico-físico) son estructuras por niveles típicas. Intuitivamente, un constituyente es una parte perteneciente a un nivel inferior. Puesto que la estructura por niveles es realmente una partición del mundo descrito por una ontología, los constituyentes no se clasifican propiamente como partes, aunque esta aproximación pueda ser intuitiva para el sentido común. Una ventaja deseable de esta distinción es que podemos hablar, por ejemplo, de constiyuentes físicos de objetos no físicos (por ejemplo, sistemas), mientras que no es posible hacerlo en términos de partes. Un ejemplo es el de las personas que constituyen un sistema social, las moléculas que constituyen una persona, los átomos que constituyen un río, etc. En todos estos ejemplos, podemos apreciar un discontinuidad típica entre el constituido y el constituyente; por ejemplo, un sistema social se conceptualiza en diferentes niveles desde la personas que lo constituyen, y un río se conceptualiza en diferentes niveles desde los átomos que los constituyen.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha costituente</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has constituent</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene constituyente</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasConstraint -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasConstraint">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isClassifiedBy"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isConstraintFor"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Parameter"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between parameters and entities. It allows to assert generic constraints (encoded as parameters), e.g. MinimumAgeForDriving isConstraintFor John (where John is a legal subject under the TrafficLaw).
The intended semantics is that a Parameter isParameterFor a Concept that classifies an Entity; moreover, it entails that a Parameter parametrizes a Region that isRegionFor that Entity.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre parámetros y entidades. Permite afirmar restricciones genéricas (codificadas como parámetros), por ejemplo, Edad Mínima Para Conducir es Restricción Para Juan (donde Juan es el sujeto legal bajo la Ley de Tráfico). La semántica que hay detrás es que un ‘parámetro’ ‘es parámetro de’ un ‘concepto’ que clasifica una ‘entidad’; además, implica que un ‘parámetro’ paratetriza una ‘región’ que ‘es región para’ esa entidad.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha vincolo</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has constraint</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene restricción</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasLocation -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasLocation">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isLocationOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A generic, relative spatial location, holding between any entities. E.g. 'the cat is on the mat', 'Omar is in Samarcanda', 'the wound is close to the femural artery'.
For 'absolute' locations, see SpaceRegion</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una localización espacial relativa y genérica, que tiene lugar entre entidades cualesquiera. Por ejemplo, “el gato está en la esterilla”, “Omar está en Samarcanda”, “la herida está cerca de la arteria femoral”. Para localizaciones “absolutas”, véase ‘región espacial’.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha localizzazione</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has location</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene localización</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasMember -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasMember">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isMemberOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Collection"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between collections and entities, e.g. 'my collection of saxophones includes an old Adolphe Sax original alto' (i.e. my collection has member an Adolphe Sax alto).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre colecciones y entidades, por ejemplo, “mi colección de saxofones incluye un alto original de Adolphe Sax” (es decir, mi colección tiene como miembro un alto de Adolphe Sax).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha membro</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has member</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene miembro</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasParameter -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasParameter">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isRelatedToConcept"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isParameterFor"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Concept"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Parameter"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A Concept can have a Parameter that constrains the attributes that a classified Entity can have in a certain Situation, e.g. a 4WheelDriver Role definedIn the ItalianTrafficLaw has a MinimumAge parameter on the Amount 16.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Un concepto puede tener un ‘parámetro’ que restringe los atributos que una ‘entidad’ clasificada puede tener en una determinada situación. Por ejemplo, un Conductor de Vehículos de Cuatro Ruedas ‘está definido en’ la Ley de Tráfico Española como alguien que tiene un parámetro Edad Mínima de 18 años.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha parametro</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has parameter</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene parámetro</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPart -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPart">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isPartOf"/>
<rdf:type rdf:resource="http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#TransitiveProperty"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A schematic relation between any entities, e.g. 'the human body has a brain as part', '20th century contains year 1923', 'World War II includes the Pearl Harbour event'.
Subproperties and restrictions can be used to specialize hasPart for objects, events, etc.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación esquemática entre entidades cualesquiera, por ejemplo, “el cuerpo humano tiene un cerebro como parte”, “el siglo XX contiene el año 1923”, “la II Guerra Mundial incluye el evento de Pearl Harbour”. Se pueden utilizar subpropiedades y restricciones para especializar ‘tiene parte’ para objetos, eventos, etc.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha parte</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has part</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene parte</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasParticipant -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasParticipant">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isParticipantIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Event"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Object"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between an object and a process, e.g. 'John took part in the discussion', 'a large mass of snow fell during the avalanche', or 'a cook, some sugar, flour, etc. are all present in the cooking of a cake'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre un objeto y un proceso, por ejemplo, “Juan tomó parte en la discusión”, “una gran masa de nieve calló durante la avalancha”, o “un cocinero, algo de azúcar, harina, etc. están presentes en la elaboración de un pastel”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha come partecipante</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has participant</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene participante</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPostcondition -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPostcondition">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyPrecedes"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isPostconditionOf"/>
<rdfs:domain>
<owl:Class>
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Event"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdfs:domain>
<rdfs:range>
<owl:Class>
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Event"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdfs:range>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Direct succession applied to situations.
E.g., 'A postcondition of our Plan is to have things settled'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Sucesión directa aplicada a situaciones. Por ejemplo, “una poscondición de nuestro plan es tener aparatos instalados”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha postcondizione</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has postcondition</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene poscondición</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPrecondition -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasPrecondition">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#directlyFollows"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isPreconditionOf"/>
<rdfs:domain>
<owl:Class>
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Event"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdfs:domain>
<rdfs:range>
<owl:Class>
<owl:unionOf rdf:parseType="Collection">
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Event"/>
<rdf:Description rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
</owl:unionOf>
</owl:Class>
</rdfs:range>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">Direct precedence applied to situations.
E.g., 'A precondition to declare war against a foreign country is claiming to find nuclear weapons in it'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Precedencia directa aplicada a situaciones. Por ejemplo, “una precondición para declarar la guerra contra un país extranjero es una afirmación de haber encontrado armas nucleares en él”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha precondizione</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has precondition</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene precondición</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasQuality -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasQuality">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isQualityOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Quality"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between entities and qualities, e.g. 'Dmitri's skin is yellowish'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre entidades y cualidades, por ejemplo, “La piel de Dmitri es amarillenta”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha qualità</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has quality</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene cualidad</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasRegion -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasRegion">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isRegionFor"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Region"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between entities and regions, e.g. 'the number of wheels of that truck is 12', 'the time of the experiment is August 9th, 2004', 'the whale has been localized at 34 degrees E, 20 degrees S'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre entidades y regiones, por ejemplo, “el número de ruedas de un camión es 12”, “el momento de realizar el experimento fue el 9 de agosto de 2004”, “la ballena ha sido localizada a 34 grados este, 30 grados sur”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha attributo</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has region</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene región</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasRole -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasRole">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isClassifiedBy"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isRoleOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Object"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Role"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between an object and a role, e.g. the person 'John' has role 'student'.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre un objeto y un papel, por ejemplo, la persona “Juan” juega el papel de “estudiante”.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha ruolo</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has role</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">juega el papel de</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasSetting -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasSetting">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#associatedWith"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isSettingFor"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Entity"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between entities and situations, e.g. 'this morning I've prepared my coffee with a new fantastic Arabica', i.e.: (an amount of) a new fantastic Arabica hasSetting the preparation of my coffee this morning.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre entidades y situaciones, por ejemplo, “esta mañana he preparado mi café con un fantástico nuevo café arábica”, es decir, (una candidad de) un fantástico nuevo café arábica ‘está en el contexto’ de preparación de mi café esta mañana.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">está en el contexto de</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has setting</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">è nel contesto di</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasTask -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasTask">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isRelatedToConcept"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isTaskOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Role"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Task"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between roles and tasks, e.g. 'students have the duty of giving exams' (i.e. the Role 'student' hasTask the Task 'giving exams').</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre papeles y tareas, por ejemplo, “los estudiantes tienen la obligación de entregar los exámenes” (es decir, el papel estudiante ‘tiene como tarea’ la ‘tarea’ de “dar los exámenes”).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha come obiettivo</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has task</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene como tarea</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasTimeInterval -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasTimeInterval">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#hasRegion"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isTimeIntervalOf"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Event"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#TimeInterval"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Relación genérica entre eventos e intervalos de tiempo.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">The generic relation between events and time intervals.</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">ha intervallo temporale</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">has time interval</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">tiene intervalo de tiempo</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#includesAction -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#includesAction">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#includesEvent"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isActionIncludedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Action"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between situations and actions, e.g. 'this morning I've prepared my coffee and had my fingers burnt' (i.e.: the preparation of my coffee this morning included a burning of my fingers).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre situaciones y acciones, por ejemplo, “esta mañana he preparado mi café y me he quemado los dedos” (es decir, la preparación de mi café esta mañana incluyó una quemadura de mis dedos).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">include azione</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">includes action</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">incluye acción</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>
<!-- https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#includesAgent -->
<owl:ObjectProperty rdf:about="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#includesAgent">
<rdfs:subPropertyOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#includesObject"/>
<owl:inverseOf rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#isAgentIncludedIn"/>
<rdfs:domain rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Situation"/>
<rdfs:range rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es#Agent"/>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="en">A relation between situations and persons, e.g. 'this morning I've prepared my coffee and had my fingers burnt' (i.e.: the preparation of my coffee this morning included me).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:comment xml:lang="es">Una relación entre situaciones y personas, por ejemplo, “esta mañana he preparado mi café y me he quemado los dedos” (es decir, la preparación de mi café esta mañana me incluyó a mí).</rdfs:comment>
<rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="https://w3id.org/def/dul-es"/>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="it">include l'agente</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="en">includes agent</rdfs:label>
<rdfs:label xml:lang="es">incluye agente</rdfs:label>
</owl:ObjectProperty>