-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
NEW MOB Sentence.. #6
Comments
Thanks for the hint. I'm always looking for information that I can use legally. Before I do research, do you know in what legal context this "public document" resides? A document can be public but under a license that specifically allows or forbids stuff. Specifically, is it derivative work to implement stuff that is described in this "public document"? |
Well the "Technical Bulletin" itself is pretty terse. there's an introduction (below):
After the introduction the technical information begins and that's about it (it's a 2 page word document). The NMEA website (where this document originates from) has some copyright babble in the terms & conditions, but is silent about derived work or licensing. It looks like public information, but then I'm not a lawyer, just programmer with a boat. Hope that helps |
Thanks.
(Un)fortunately, me too. |
You're probably aware but I just wanted to make sure, I didn't see it in the source code:
NMEA has added a new sentence to the 4.10 spec for Man overboard.
$--MOB, blah, blah,blah,,,,,,0*2F
I know the whole legality of 'Reverse Engineering' a proprietary spec is tight rope to walk, derivative work, , but the technical bulletin I found from NMEA on the Man overboard sentence specifically states it's a public document if you want to research it.
"I specifically did not put a link to the document here to maintain your legal cleanliness"
It's easy enough to find...
Hope this helps, I only bring it up for completeness...
Cheers,
TR. Martin
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: