Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrating with software modems #98

Closed
rafael2k opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 1 comment
Closed

Integrating with software modems #98

rafael2k opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@rafael2k
Copy link

Hi all,
I'm planning to create an interface of Reticulum to software modems (like FreeDATA and Ardop), but most of these software modems just support point-to-point. Is there a problem of this in working with Reticulum?

Eg. of how a network operating in HF with UUCP works today: open a connection to host XX, sync the data, close connection, open a connection to host YY, sync the data, close connection... and so on. Is this model ok to work with Reticulum?

My plan is to use UUCP over Reticulum. Can anyone see a problem with it?

@markqvist
Copy link
Owner

There should not be any issues with this. Reticulum supports using any physical/virtual device as:

  • A point-to-point medium
  • A point-to-multipoint medium
  • A multipoint-to-multipoint medium (this one sounds weird, since it is so rarely used, but it is not a mistake)

Any of those can also have intermittency without causing problems (other than the syncing being unavailable sometimes, of course). You don't have to configure anything in these regards, Reticulum will figure it out automatically.

There are similarities to this in how LXMF works, so there should not be any problems as such.

Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Sep 28, 2022
@markqvist markqvist converted this issue into discussion #100 Sep 28, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants