You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since Landau Vishkin is so fast when query and target are very similar, maybe it would be good idea to first start calculation with Landau Vishkin for a few small k, then if it does not produce result I can switch to Myers. Reason for this is that Myers is actually not very efficient for small k because it will calculate whole block anyway, although band is maybe very small.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This idea is really good. It would be vise to try with Landau Vishkin until we reach k = 64, and if no solution is found then continue with Myers. Of course we should try moving this boundary of 64, but I believe it could be good. This way we would get the most of both methods! Of course this is all just for SHW alignment mode.
Since Landau Vishkin is so fast when query and target are very similar, maybe it would be good idea to first start calculation with Landau Vishkin for a few small k, then if it does not produce result I can switch to Myers. Reason for this is that Myers is actually not very efficient for small k because it will calculate whole block anyway, although band is maybe very small.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: