Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MATE Volume Control adjusts volume in highly non-linear way when ALSA backend is used #70

Closed
LavirtheWhiolet opened this issue Oct 29, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@LavirtheWhiolet
Copy link

I have uninstalled PulseAudio and use plain ALSA. MATE Volume Control has started to behave differently: anything below 50% is inaudible, and all the action occurs between about 70 & 100.

In AlsaMixer the scale is perceived almost linear.

Screenshots show that changing the volume in MATE Volume Control also changes the volume in AlsaMixer. But, as said above, the scale of AlsaMixer is perceived almost linear so the scale in MATE Volume Control is perceived like logarithmic one.

-1
-2
-3
-4

@LavirtheWhiolet LavirtheWhiolet changed the title mate-volume-control controls volume non-linearly when ALSA is used mate-volume-control controls volume non-linearly when ALSA backend is used Oct 30, 2015
@LavirtheWhiolet LavirtheWhiolet changed the title mate-volume-control controls volume non-linearly when ALSA backend is used MATE Volume Control adjusts volume in highly non-linear way when ALSA backend is used Oct 30, 2015
@monsta
Copy link
Contributor

monsta commented Nov 30, 2015

@mratajsky: can you please take a look at this?

@mratajsky
Copy link
Contributor

From the screenshot you are using the gst-mixer from MATE 1.8 which is unsupported software. The current mixer in MATE 1.10 and 1.12 should not exhibit this behaviour (if it does, please let us know), although it's currently lacking in support for secondary channels on ALSA (I hope we'll improve this soon). So in short, please use a more recent mixer.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants