Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Threads on Conduit are not updating #25875

Open
timokoesters opened this issue Jul 30, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk#3635
Open

Threads on Conduit are not updating #25875

timokoesters opened this issue Jul 30, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk#3635
Labels
O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow S-Major Severely degrades major functionality or product features, with no satisfactory workaround T-Defect

Comments

@timokoesters
Copy link

timokoesters commented Jul 30, 2023

Steps to reproduce

  1. Open a thread view
  2. Let another person send messages into that thread

Outcome

These are screenshots of the thread sidebar:

Expected (sending end):
image

Actual (on conduit):
image

On F5, it loads all the events correctly

Here is the json conduit sends on sync when a message is received:

{
    "next_batch": "48192924",
    "rooms": {
        "join": {
            "!HOcnOih5WdoNDnmpv6:conduit.rs": {
                "unread_notifications": {
                    "highlight_count": 0,
                    "notification_count": 0
                },
                "unread_thread_notifications": {
                    "$Ag9x_K8hXCXHSoRMoFEIOjnUzi8PYhFjU5F-PHUkCdw": {
                        "highlight_count": 0,
                        "notification_count": 1
                    }
                },
                "timeline": {
                    "prev_batch": "48192924",
                    "events": [
                        {
                            "content": {
                                "algorithm": "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2",
                                "ciphertext": "AwgQEoABxMMQU5yrftEpMhvtzJ56QnIcw7+gPkDBo6rhySi8hH/L3ZQvGNJH5+/MVZihVET1t7T6A/3VPcEr0E/7x2hRVFe81z5G5uBwmPZ5N41PNBTmoy8W6r4KTZNeEnUzKAZPHpjrc8z1IyY5i5zazzj9n3kO/deoKNhr9N5V9vImLR3qd44C/ZkIo26uSDnRzjTg6viWjlEKrTo/fmZ3shriioDgBYfrp/ecn9HDe1p9Ewq9Gc8+jeAcSaBhTG6VRKosZUck4aSJhgI",
                                "device_id": "FOSCZYSEJK",
                                "m.relates_to": {
                                    "event_id": "$Ag9x_K8hXCXHSoRMoFEIOjnUzi8PYhFjU5F-PHUkCdw",
                                    "is_falling_back": true,
                                    "m.in_reply_to": {
                                        "event_id": "$oDqz_4ztDa0bNxFSF6ICUyDUato2TaHLMmWEloXxGuM"
                                    },
                                    "rel_type": "m.thread"
                                },
                                "sender_key": "DpEtvnHAOkfASDKKhKWvbIV8yMdjRObhE5YeWnvkWDc",
                                "session_id": "kp/KNpe6KrE05grv8xK9r1vrjfJPbe4lML1LFcq5gXs"
                            },
                            "event_id": "$r-DOyLbvlpOjsvzG9zcgwjGhnkFLt9qmtGZY4Hw6m9o",
                            "origin_server_ts": 1690740266017,
                            "sender": "@timokoesters:fachschaften.org",
                            "type": "m.room.encrypted"
                        }
                    ]
                }
            }
        }
    },
    "device_one_time_keys_count": {
        "signed_curve25519": 50
    },
    "device_unused_fallback_key_types": null
}

It's very similar to what synapse sends, so I wonder if it's caused by some missing field or the field order.

Operating system

No response

Browser information

No response

URL for webapp

No response

Application version

No response

Homeserver

No response

Will you send logs?

No

@weeman1337 weeman1337 added S-Major Severely degrades major functionality or product features, with no satisfactory workaround O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow labels Aug 7, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow S-Major Severely degrades major functionality or product features, with no satisfactory workaround T-Defect
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants