Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC3997: Add timestamp massaging to /createRoom #3997

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MadLittleMods
Copy link
Contributor

@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods commented Apr 13, 2023

MSC3997: Add timestamp massaging to /createRoom?ts=123


Rendered

Server implementations:

  • Implementations needed

Other related references:

@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods changed the title MSCXXX: Add timestamp massaging to /createRoom MSC3997: Add timestamp massaging to /createRoom Apr 13, 2023
@MadLittleMods MadLittleMods marked this pull request as ready for review April 13, 2023 19:19
@turt2live turt2live added proposal A matrix spec change proposal client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. labels Apr 13, 2023
@@ -0,0 +1,91 @@
# MSC3997: Add timestamp massaging to `/createRoom`
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

cc @ara4n as the original ?ts proposer from the old version of MSC2716

cc @tulir as an interested party in timestamp massaging (author of MSC3316 and one of the main consumers of the ?ts API)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
client-server Client-Server API kind:maintenance MSC which clarifies/updates existing spec needs-implementation This MSC does not have a qualifying implementation for the SCT to review. The MSC cannot enter FCP. proposal A matrix spec change proposal
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants