-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix definition of response of POST /_matrix/federation/v1/user/keys/claim
#1559
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
Fix definition of response of `POST /_matrix/federation/v1/user/keys/claim`. |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm unconvinced this is correct. Is it true that a string can be returned here? The description doesn't seem to say anything about that being permissible.
@KitsuneRal you seem to have suggested this is correct at #1351 (comment), but I don't know why you said that?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good question - might very well be a copy-pasta on my end. Can one-time keys be unsigned - guess not? If not, my suggestion is incorrect and there should be
KeyObject
here, without alternatives.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, so it's not a copy-pasta on my end at least. The alternative between
string
andobject
has been here since the very beginning, even though undocumented. My comment in #1351 referred to the correct nesting level and I mentioned thatstring
has to be returned only because it has been there before. If it hasn't been correct from the beginning then I'd rather we fix it in a separate PR but I'm fine either way.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, I think I've figured this out!
Before we invented the
signed_curve25519
key algorithm for one-time-keys, we just usedcurve25519
keys. These, not being signed, can be represented just by a string.The
curve25519
algorithm should no longer be used here, but removing them from the spec sounds like a different job.So, 👍 to this fix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(more on algorithms at https://spec.matrix.org/v1.7/client-server-api/#key-algorithms and https://gitlab.matrix.org/matrix-org/olm/-/blob/master/docs/signing.md#signing-one-time-keys)