Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Support the backwards compatibility features in MSC3952. #14958

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Feb 3, 2023
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 4 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Diff view
Diff view
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions changelog.d/14958.feature
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
Experimental support for [MSC3952](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3952): intentional mentions.
4 changes: 4 additions & 0 deletions rust/benches/evaluator.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ fn bench_match_exact(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -71,6 +72,7 @@ fn bench_match_word(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -109,6 +111,7 @@ fn bench_match_word_miss(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -147,6 +150,7 @@ fn bench_eval_message(b: &mut Bencher) {

let eval = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down
18 changes: 18 additions & 0 deletions rust/src/push/evaluator.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ pub struct PushRuleEvaluator {
/// The "content.body", if any.
body: String,

/// True if the event has a messages property and MSC3952 support is enabled.
has_mentions: bool,
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
/// The user mentions that were part of the message.
user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>,
/// True if the message is a room message.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
#[new]
pub fn py_new(
flattened_keys: BTreeMap<String, String>,
has_mentions: bool,
user_mentions: BTreeSet<String>,
room_mention: bool,
room_member_count: u64,
Expand All @@ -123,6 +126,7 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
Ok(PushRuleEvaluator {
flattened_keys,
body,
has_mentions,
user_mentions,
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -155,6 +159,18 @@ impl PushRuleEvaluator {
}

let rule_id = &push_rule.rule_id().to_string();

// For backwards-compatibility the legacy mention rules are disabled
// only if the event contains the 'm.mentions' property (and if the
// experimental feature is enabled, we check that in the Python code).
if self.has_mentions
&& (rule_id == ".m.rule.contains_display_name"
|| rule_id == ".m.rule.contains_user_name"
|| rule_id == ".m.rule.roomnotif")
{
continue;
}

let extev_flag = &RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string();
let supports_extensible_events = self.room_version_feature_flags.contains(extev_flag);
let safe_from_rver_condition = SAFE_EXTENSIBLE_EVENTS_RULE_IDS.contains(rule_id);
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -441,6 +457,7 @@ fn push_rule_evaluator() {
flattened_keys.insert("content.body".to_string(), "foo bar bob hello".to_string());
let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -468,6 +485,7 @@ fn test_requires_room_version_supports_condition() {
let flags = vec![RoomVersionFeatures::ExtensibleEvents.as_str().to_string()];
let evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator::py_new(
flattened_keys,
false,
BTreeSet::new(),
false,
10,
Expand Down
1 change: 1 addition & 0 deletions stubs/synapse/synapse_rust/push.pyi
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ class PushRuleEvaluator:
def __init__(
self,
flattened_keys: Mapping[str, str],
has_mentions: bool,
user_mentions: Set[str],
room_mention: bool,
room_member_count: int,
Expand Down
8 changes: 7 additions & 1 deletion synapse/push/bulk_push_rule_evaluator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -119,6 +119,9 @@ def __init__(self, hs: "HomeServer"):
self.should_calculate_push_rules = self.hs.config.push.enable_push

self._related_event_match_enabled = self.hs.config.experimental.msc3664_enabled
self._intentional_mentions_enabled = (
self.hs.config.experimental.msc3952_intentional_mentions
)

self.room_push_rule_cache_metrics = register_cache(
"cache",
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -364,9 +367,11 @@ async def _action_for_event_by_user(

# Pull out any user and room mentions.
mentions = event.content.get(EventContentFields.MSC3952_MENTIONS)
has_mentions = self._intentional_mentions_enabled and isinstance(mentions, dict)
user_mentions: Set[str] = set()
room_mention = False
if isinstance(mentions, dict):
if has_mentions:
assert isinstance(mentions, dict)
clokep marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
# Remove out any non-string items and convert to a set.
user_mentions_raw = mentions.get("user_ids")
if isinstance(user_mentions_raw, list):
Expand All @@ -378,6 +383,7 @@ async def _action_for_event_by_user(

evaluator = PushRuleEvaluator(
_flatten_dict(event, room_version=event.room_version),
has_mentions,
user_mentions,
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down
18 changes: 11 additions & 7 deletions tests/push/test_push_rule_evaluator.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ def _get_evaluator(
self,
content: JsonMapping,
*,
has_mentions: bool = False,
user_mentions: Optional[Set[str]] = None,
room_mention: bool = False,
related_events: Optional[JsonDict] = None,
Expand All @@ -62,6 +63,7 @@ def _get_evaluator(
power_levels: Dict[str, Union[int, Dict[str, int]]] = {}
return PushRuleEvaluator(
_flatten_dict(event),
has_mentions,
user_mentions or set(),
room_mention,
room_member_count,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -102,19 +104,21 @@ def test_user_mentions(self) -> None:
condition = {"kind": "org.matrix.msc3952.is_user_mention"}

# No mentions shouldn't match.
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({})
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True)
self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None))

# An empty set shouldn't match
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, user_mentions=set())
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions=set())
self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None))

# The Matrix ID appearing anywhere in the mentions list should match
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, user_mentions={"@user:test"})
evaluator = self._get_evaluator(
{}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@user:test"}
)
self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None))

evaluator = self._get_evaluator(
{}, user_mentions={"@another:test", "@user:test"}
{}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@another:test", "@user:test"}
)
self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, "@user:test", None))

Expand All @@ -126,16 +130,16 @@ def test_room_mentions(self) -> None:
condition = {"kind": "org.matrix.msc3952.is_room_mention"}

# No room mention shouldn't match.
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({})
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True)
self.assertFalse(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None))

# Room mention should match.
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, room_mention=True)
evaluator = self._get_evaluator({}, has_mentions=True, room_mention=True)
self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None))

# A room mention and user mention is valid.
evaluator = self._get_evaluator(
{}, user_mentions={"@another:test"}, room_mention=True
{}, has_mentions=True, user_mentions={"@another:test"}, room_mention=True
)
self.assertTrue(evaluator.matches(condition, None, None))

Expand Down