Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fileservice: add i/o timeout as retryable error #16345

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 30, 2024
Merged

Conversation

reusee
Copy link
Contributor

@reusee reusee commented May 23, 2024

What type of PR is this?

  • API-change
  • BUG
  • Improvement
  • Documentation
  • Feature
  • Test and CI
  • Code Refactoring

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

issue #15307

What this PR does / why we need it:

retry on i/o timeout

@reusee reusee requested a review from badboynt1 May 23, 2024 03:24
@matrix-meow matrix-meow added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes [1, 9] lines label May 23, 2024
@mergify mergify bot added the kind/bug Something isn't working label May 23, 2024
@matrix-meow
Copy link
Contributor

@reusee Thanks for your contributions!

Pull Request Review:

Title:

The title of the pull request is clear and concise, indicating the specific change being made to the fileservice related to adding I/O timeout as a retryable error.

Body:

The body of the pull request provides relevant information about the type of PR, the specific issue it fixes, and the reason for the change. It also mentions that the PR is related to retrying on I/O timeout, which aligns with the title and the code changes.

Changes:

  1. The code change in the IsRetryableError function in error.go file adds the condition strings.Contains(str, "i/o timeout") to check for I/O timeout errors as retryable errors.

Feedback and Suggestions for Improvement:

  1. Security Concern:

    • It's important to handle I/O timeout errors carefully, especially in scenarios where retrying may not be the best approach. Consider the implications of retrying on I/O timeout errors, as it may lead to potential performance issues or unintended consequences. Ensure that retrying is the appropriate action for these specific errors.
  2. Code Optimization:

    • Instead of directly checking for the string "i/o timeout", consider using a more robust and specific error type or variable to identify I/O timeout errors. This can help in better error handling and clarity in code maintenance.
  3. Error Handling Strategy:

    • Evaluate the overall error handling strategy in the fileservice module to ensure that retrying on specific errors, including I/O timeout, aligns with the application's requirements and performance considerations.
  4. Documentation:

    • Consider updating the documentation or adding comments to explain the rationale behind retrying on I/O timeout errors and any considerations that developers should be aware of when dealing with such errors.
  5. Testing:

    • Verify that the retry mechanism for I/O timeout errors works as expected by adding appropriate test cases to cover this scenario. Ensure that the retry logic is robust and handles edge cases effectively.
  6. Consistency:

    • Ensure consistency in error handling across the fileservice module to maintain a coherent approach to handling different types of errors.
  7. Code Review:

    • Request a thorough code review from team members to validate the changes and gather feedback on the error handling strategy, especially regarding retrying on I/O timeout errors.

By addressing the security concerns, optimizing the code, refining the error handling strategy, updating documentation, testing thoroughly, maintaining consistency, and seeking code review, the pull request can be enhanced to ensure the reliability and efficiency of the fileservice module.

Overall, the pull request is on the right track by addressing retryable errors related to I/O timeout, but it requires careful consideration and validation to ensure it aligns with best practices and the application's requirements.

@mergify mergify bot merged commit 7c73455 into matrixorigin:main May 30, 2024
17 of 18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/bug Something isn't working size/XS Denotes a PR that changes [1, 9] lines
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants