This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 19, 2022. It is now read-only.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My previous commit to "fix" the ssh control path by including the remote
user and port also made it more likely that the resulting path would
exceed the maximum allowed length of the path to a unix domain socket.
I've replaced the use of '%r@%h:%p' in the ssh control path with '%C',
which is substituted by a hash of the concatenation of '%l%h%p%r', so it
still includes the remote user, host and port, but is also a predictable
length and less likely to exceed the maximum allowed length of a path to
a unix domain socket (104 "chars" on OSX, 108 I think on Linux).
The change was made after I ran into a "too long for Unix domain socket"
error myself when cooking a node, and has been tested in production.