Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Testing and validation needs better automation #126

Closed
linjer opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 7 comments
Closed

Testing and validation needs better automation #126

linjer opened this issue Mar 27, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@linjer
Copy link

linjer commented Mar 27, 2017

After following issue #29 , it looks like we need people to perform certain manual tests before we are confident enough to merge PRs.

This may be easier to address with Travis + testing. What is the general status of this project in that regard?

@tatokis
Copy link
Collaborator

tatokis commented Mar 27, 2017 via email

@linjer
Copy link
Author

linjer commented Mar 27, 2017

Ah thank you @tatokis . If this is a duplicate of another issue, feel free to close.

@ghost ghost added the enhancement label Mar 27, 2017
@auibrian
Copy link
Contributor

To be fair, this worked flawlessly for me on 10.12.2. I had to upgrade to 10.12.3 to reproduce it. So whatever CI is implemented is going to need to support multiple versions of macOS.

@tatokis
Copy link
Collaborator

tatokis commented Mar 27, 2017 via email

@linjer
Copy link
Author

linjer commented Mar 27, 2017

@auibrian My understanding is that Travis CI does support multiple versions of OSX and XCode, based on this doc: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/osx-ci-environment/

@tatokis What are the current challenges? Is there a tag with all the issues which need to be resolved for us to get to 1.0? I'd love to contribute if you can point me in the right direction, I would greatly appreciate it.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 27, 2017

@linjer if you mean some kind of release, then it's a floating question, can be speculated on and decided either way by everyone's acceptance or someone's strong-willed decision. If you really mean 1.0, the project might not reach it in the nearest future, according to an old roadmap. If you are looking for challenges, the problems tagged as bugs are the most severe ones.

@tatokis
Copy link
Collaborator

tatokis commented Jan 22, 2018

ckb-next/ckb-next#12

@tatokis tatokis closed this as completed Jan 22, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants