Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(loadtest): Do not initiate transactions with 0 amount #1847

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2024

Conversation

popzxc
Copy link
Member

@popzxc popzxc commented May 2, 2024

What ❔

Makes sure that any transaction has amount of 1 wei at least.

Why ❔

  • It is no longer possible to withdraw 0 wei, so the test became flaky.
  • Testing edge cases is not a point for loadtest, we have integration tests for that.

Checklist

  • PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog entries from PRs).
  • Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
  • Documentation comments have been added / updated.
  • Code has been formatted via zk fmt and zk lint.
  • Spellcheck has been run via zk spellcheck.
  • Linkcheck has been run via zk linkcheck.

@popzxc popzxc enabled auto-merge May 2, 2024 09:14
@popzxc popzxc added this pull request to the merge queue May 2, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 1bbe108 May 2, 2024
37 checks passed
@popzxc popzxc deleted the popzxc-loadtest-no-zero-withdrawals branch May 2, 2024 09:49
Deniallugo pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 7, 2024
## What ❔

Makes sure that any transaction has amount of 1 wei at least.

## Why ❔

- It is no longer possible to withdraw 0 wei, so the test became flaky.
- Testing edge cases is not a point for loadtest, we have integration
tests for that.

## Checklist

<!-- Check your PR fulfills the following items. -->
<!-- For draft PRs check the boxes as you complete them. -->

- [ ] PR title corresponds to the body of PR (we generate changelog
entries from PRs).
- [ ] Tests for the changes have been added / updated.
- [ ] Documentation comments have been added / updated.
- [ ] Code has been formatted via `zk fmt` and `zk lint`.
- [ ] Spellcheck has been run via `zk spellcheck`.
- [ ] Linkcheck has been run via `zk linkcheck`.
RomanBrodetski pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 8, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[24.1.0](core-v24.0.0...core-v24.1.0)
(2024-05-08)


### Features

* add `sendRawTransactionWithDetailedOutput` API
([#1806](#1806))
([6a30a31](6a30a31))
* add getGasPerPubdataByte endpoint
([#1778](#1778))
([d62dd08](d62dd08))
* **config:** Wrap sensitive urls
([#1828](#1828))
([c8ee740](c8ee740))
* **db:** Implement weak references to RocksDB
([e0d4daa](e0d4daa))
* **en:** Add pruning health checks and rework pruning config
([#1790](#1790))
([e0d4daa](e0d4daa))
* Extract proof_data_handler into separate crate
([#1677](#1677))
([f4facee](f4facee))
* Extract several crates from zksync_core
([#1859](#1859))
([7dcf796](7dcf796))
* **node:** Extract genesis into separate crate
([#1797](#1797))
([a8c4599](a8c4599))
* **Prover CLI:** `status batch` command
([#1638](#1638))
([3fd6d65](3fd6d65))
* prover components versioning
([#1660](#1660))
([29a4ffc](29a4ffc))
* Update provers current version
([#1872](#1872))
([bb5f129](bb5f129))


### Bug Fixes

* **basic_types:** bincode deserialization for `L2ChainId`
([#1835](#1835))
([fde85f4](fde85f4))
* **contract-verifier:** YUL system-mode verification
([#1863](#1863))
([5aa7d41](5aa7d41))
* **loadtest:** Do not initiate transactions with 0 amount
([#1847](#1847))
([1bbe108](1bbe108))


### Performance Improvements

* **db:** Fine-tune state keeper cache performance / RAM usage
([#1804](#1804))
([82bf40e](82bf40e))
* **state-keeper:** Improve `FilterWrittenSlots` l1 batch seal stage
([#1854](#1854))
([4cf235f](4cf235f))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).

---------

Co-authored-by: perekopskiy <mikeson.dp@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants