-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 68
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bots #25
Conversation
The quality of |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The changes outlined in the PR description look good. Thanks @hanzei!
Tagging @asaadmahmood for this question |
@hanzei Here's one with a larger resolution. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great! And yes the refactoring is much appreciated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
with 1 nit
@@ -31,15 +32,20 @@ func TestPlugin(t *testing.T) { | |||
|
|||
str, _ := json.Marshal(user) | |||
|
|||
w.Write([]byte(str)) | |||
if _, err := w.Write(str); err != nil { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: save the if
, require will panic if err anyway
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How do you know this?
This PR:
server
The best way to review the code is my reviewing the individual commits.
If the refactoring changes are appreciated, I can also apply them to
server/zoom
.Fixes #21