Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

minimal: try to make component ID less confusing #1876

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Aug 31, 2022

Conversation

julianoes
Copy link
Collaborator

This is my attempt to avoid some confusion around MAV_COMP_ID_SYSTEM_CONTROL. Essentially, it shouldn't be used anymore.

Replacing it with MAV_COMP_ID_ALL only makes sense as a target though, and not as a source.

@hamishwillee let me know what you think. I had someone confused about this the other day but I can't remember the specifics. What I do remember is making a todo to make it less confusing, and this is my attempt to do so.

This is my attempt to avoid some confusion around
MAV_COMP_ID_SYSTEM_CONTROL. Essentially, it shouldn't be used anymore.

Replacing it with MAV_COMP_ID_ALL only makes sense as a target though,
and not as a source.
@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

Works for me! Undraft and let's rubber stamp in the dev call.

@julianoes julianoes marked this pull request as ready for review August 21, 2022 04:08
@hamishwillee
Copy link
Collaborator

Merging, as discussed in the dev call. FYI @julianoes I modified this a little to move the specific deprecation information inside that tag.

@hamishwillee hamishwillee merged commit c424dc6 into master Aug 31, 2022
@hamishwillee hamishwillee deleted the pr-system-control branch August 31, 2022 23:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants