Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Data macro unhygienic #5

Open
mavxg opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Open

Data macro unhygienic #5

mavxg opened this issue Jun 15, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
bug

Comments

@mavxg
Copy link
Owner

mavxg commented Jun 15, 2018

Data macro must not be called with the same prefix or the expansion will have shadowed definitions for "$prefix RAW" and "$prefix IDX"
@mavxg mavxg added the bug label Jun 15, 2018
@mavxg
Copy link
Owner Author

mavxg commented Jun 15, 2018

$prefix RAW doesn't seem to be needed at all. $prefix IDX seems to be about performance by ensuring only one Index(...) regardless of the extracted fields.

Can this be fixed with a gensym like concept? How will that interact with wanting to do partial recalculation?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@mavxg