You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This is more of a suggested improvement rather than an issue. In their 2012 paper (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a91/b7e3dc884928d1923bf6be28228bee42ae44.pdf) Marin, Wendland, and Strack show how fractures can be added to Analytic Element Models. If one of the elements, like inhomogeneity1d, already satisfies this request, please disregard this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion. Do I understand it correctly that the fractures are modeled with a constant width and uniform hydraulic conductivity? What would you suggest for vertical exchange between layers? Currently, the LineSinkDitch and LineSinkDitchString can do highly conductive fractures where the head is uniform in the fracture.
I believe your assumptions are correct in terms of width and conductivity. Unfortunately, the vertical exchange is not considered in the paper! Maybe @ispmarin can help?
This is more of a suggested improvement rather than an issue. In their 2012 paper (https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a91/b7e3dc884928d1923bf6be28228bee42ae44.pdf) Marin, Wendland, and Strack show how fractures can be added to Analytic Element Models. If one of the elements, like inhomogeneity1d, already satisfies this request, please disregard this issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: