-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
output all off-target score #18
Comments
yeah, that seems possible though it may take a bit of rework (I think the Doench CFD score is the only that is meaningful for a single off-target). |
i think the program haved calculated Doench CFD score for every single off-target befor outputing DoenchCFD_maxOT, so what the score class need to motify is just including Doench CFD score in the offTargets column for every single off-target with score option --includeOTs, like this |
I've put up a pre-release version 1.12a that supports this. During both the discover and score modules you'll need to have "--includeOTs" added to your command line. We have to support any number of these associated scores, so the output looks a little different than you proposed: ACTGTCCCAGCAGCAGAAGAGGG_1_4chr22:48437007^R{Doench2016CFDScore=0.06444234483586098}, There are some more things to test, but I thought you might want to try it out. |
thank you very much, i'll have a try. |
Sorry, just lurking here and listening in, and wondering why we still don't
have a better off-target score than John Doench's CFD... isn't that weird?
Maybe it's just too hard as a problem...
… |
Waiting for the meta-analysis in CRISPOR2 to tell us a better metric :-) |
how to output off-target score for every single off-target , but not only DoenchCFD_maxOT and DoenchCFD_specificityscore of all off-target?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: