Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

output all off-target score #18

Closed
ryys1122 opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 6 comments
Closed

output all off-target score #18

ryys1122 opened this issue Sep 10, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@ryys1122
Copy link

how to output off-target score for every single off-target , but not only DoenchCFD_maxOT and DoenchCFD_specificityscore of all off-target?

@aaronmck
Copy link
Collaborator

yeah, that seems possible though it may take a bit of rework (I think the Doench CFD score is the only that is meaningful for a single off-target).

@ryys1122
Copy link
Author

i think the program haved calculated Doench CFD score for every single off-target befor outputing DoenchCFD_maxOT, so what the score class need to motify is just including Doench CFD score in the offTargets column for every single off-target with score option --includeOTs, like this
AAAAATAGGGAAAAGGGCACCGG_1_4_Doench_CFD_score<2:838572^R>,ACAAATATAGCACATGCCACTGG_1_4Doench_CFD_score<5:220383333^F>

@aaronmck
Copy link
Collaborator

aaronmck commented Sep 17, 2020

I've put up a pre-release version 1.12a that supports this. During both the discover and score modules you'll need to have "--includeOTs" added to your command line. We have to support any number of these associated scores, so the output looks a little different than you proposed:

ACTGTCCCAGCAGCAGAAGAGGG_1_4chr22:48437007^R{Doench2016CFDScore=0.06444234483586098},

There are some more things to test, but I thought you might want to try it out.

@ryys1122
Copy link
Author

thank you very much, i'll have a try.

@maximilianh
Copy link

maximilianh commented Sep 21, 2020 via email

@aaronmck
Copy link
Collaborator

Waiting for the meta-analysis in CRISPOR2 to tell us a better metric :-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants