Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Imagemagick version still shows as 6.5.7-8 #10

Open
ben-hudson opened this issue Oct 18, 2014 · 4 comments
Open

Imagemagick version still shows as 6.5.7-8 #10

ben-hudson opened this issue Oct 18, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@ben-hudson
Copy link

If I push using git push heroku master I get

-----> Fetching custom git buildpack... done
-----> Multipack app detected
=====> Downloading Buildpack: https://github.com/mcollina/heroku-buildpack-imagemagick.git
=====> Detected Framework: 
-----> Installing libpng 1.5.14
       Download completed
       Installation completed
-----> Installing imagemagick 6.8.2-3
       Download completed
       Installation completed
-----> Building runtime environment for imagemagick
=====> Downloading Buildpack: https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-python.git
=====> Detected Framework: Python
-----> Installing dependencies with pip
       Cleaning up...

Using release configuration from last framework (Python).
-----> Discovering process types
       Procfile declares types -> web

-----> Compressing... done, 35.1MB

But if I run heroku run bash directly afterwards...

~ $ convert -version
Version: ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 2012-08-17 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2009 ImageMagick Studio LLC
Features: OpenMP 

It seems like the buildpack isn't actually applying anything. My .buildpack looks like

https://github.com/mcollina/heroku-buildpack-graphicsmagick.git
https://github.com/heroku/heroku-buildpack-python.git
@mcollina
Copy link
Owner

Completely no idea. This project unmaintained due to the impossibility of creating new builds of the project.

@mcollina
Copy link
Owner

@mcollina
Copy link
Owner

However, if you are on plain Cedar, and you have a fix for this I'll merge it straight away!

@ben-hudson
Copy link
Author

Hey thanks for getting back to me. I'm on the plain cedar stack not cedar-14.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants