feat(templates): Use Ruff to lint projects generated with Cookiecutter templates

[edgarrmondragon]

---

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://meltano-sdk--1648.org.readthedocs.build/en/1648/

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #1648 (8972966) into main (3609320) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1648   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.05%   85.05%           
=======================================
  Files          58       58           
  Lines        4845     4845           
  Branches      805      805           
=======================================
  Hits         4121     4121           
  Misses        526      526           
  Partials      198      198           

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

[WillDaSilva]

Looks good to me. I found one issue where a fresh SQL target would fail a Ruff check, but I pushed a commit to fix it.

This is a significant reduction of the number of dev dependencies each SDK-based tap/target will have, which is great for avoiding dependency hell.

I noticed that the Ruff target version is py37. That makes sense for now, but we'll want to update that to py38 on 2023-06-27 per https://devguide.python.org/versions/

[edgarrmondragon]

Looks good to me. I found one issue where a fresh SQL target would fail a Ruff check, but I pushed a commit to fix it.

This is a significant reduction of the number of dev dependencies each SDK-based tap/target will have, which is great for avoiding dependency hell.

I noticed that the Ruff target version is py37. That makes sense for now, but we'll want to update that to py38 on 2023-06-27 per https://devguide.python.org/versions/

thanks @WillDaSilva, I added a test for that missing case to make sure both "per record" and SQL targets pass Ruff checks.