Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

deepbgc pipeline does not seem to use more than 2 cores? #65

Open
bkm23644 opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

deepbgc pipeline does not seem to use more than 2 cores? #65

bkm23644 opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@bkm23644
Copy link

Hello,

Thank you for taking the time to develop this tool, it does exactly what I need it to do for my odd gene clusters. However, the only issue is that it takes more than 20 minutes per fasta file for some bacterial genomes. Is this normal?

I have made a simple model both locally on my macbook and on my university's computational cluster and ran deepbgc pipeline on a single bacterial genome fasta file and in both cases there is no improvement in processing speed past 2 cores. When reading the HMMER user manual, it suggests that it should be capable of utilizing all of the cores available. However, deepbgc pipeline --help does not suggest there is a command to specify how many cpu's it can utilize.

Am I missing something obvious here? Should it take 20 minutes for one fasta file? It seems like it would take decades to get through a metagenome at that rate. My apologies for the ignorance, but how does deepbgc call hmmscan/search?

I looked through some of the other issue reports, but we do not seem to be having the same problems. Any advice you can offer is greatly appreciated, I really would like to use this tool for my work.

Thanks

@LuisFF
Copy link

LuisFF commented Mar 17, 2022

You could try setting up HMMER_NCPU environment variable. Check --cpu flag in HMMER documentation.

@bkm23644
Copy link
Author

bkm23644 commented Mar 17, 2022 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants