You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Perhaps the diagram type classDiagram would be suited for you needs?
The project has got good traction but it also means that it is very hard to manage all issues on your spare time. I am trying to get a bigger team together for faster development and better support #866. I am closing this one for now, not out of disrespect but as a part of an effort to clean out stale issues that has been resolved but not closed.
Yes. I was just trying to document some ideas for how to make the implementations a bit more scalable. This feature could potentially deprecate the uml drawing type and and more capable to a generic layout type.
The following are implementations for various shapes using the TD/LR layout:
() - rounded corners
(()) - circle
{} - diamond
This feature is designed to treat a class UML object in the same manner a shape is used. Consequently #806 can define the layout of the graph.
Proposal for Class UML shape:
graph TD
class0{{class0|int foo|str bar}}
end
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: