Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Request] Update device list to be categoriesed by Vendor? #64

Closed
Talie5in opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 3 comments
Closed

[Request] Update device list to be categoriesed by Vendor? #64

Talie5in opened this issue Apr 23, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Talie5in
Copy link
Sponsor

The current list is getting long and requires scrolling to get down to beyond Nano G1 (at 1920x1200) so probably worse at 1920x1080.
Is it worth doing sub-tree's based on Hardware Vendor, with the ability to search to filter down the list?)

Even if done for the Vendors with many options and leaving the rest in the maintree if they only have 1 deivce (eg, CanaryOne, Hydra, unPhone)

Would make the WebFlasher UX a little simpler/easier to navigate.
eg,
[FILTERBOX]
Lilygo ->
------- T-Beam
------- T-Deck
------- T-Beam
------- T-Beam S3 Core
Heltec ->
------- V3
------- Wireless Paper
------- Wireless Paper V1.0
------- Wireless Tracker
rPi ->
------- Pico
------- Pico W
------- Pi Computer S3
RakWireless ->
------- RAK11310
------- RAK4631
CanaryOne
Hydra
Unphone

@Talie5in
Copy link
Sponsor Author

Just bumping this - as now we are getting more and more hardware devices (additional Rak, Heltec etc showing up)

@thebentern
Copy link
Contributor

Ended up doing this by architecture #64 for now, but may revisit

@Talie5in
Copy link
Sponsor Author

Talie5in commented Jun 23, 2024

@thebentern Looks smexy like that, just noting however rak11310 ended up under RPi Pico banner. because they are rpi pico derp me.

However still a long list initially, worth starting with them collapsed?

Hopefully will revisit, I think by Vendor may be more intuitive to most end users.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants