You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current list is getting long and requires scrolling to get down to beyond Nano G1 (at 1920x1200) so probably worse at 1920x1080.
Is it worth doing sub-tree's based on Hardware Vendor, with the ability to search to filter down the list?)
Even if done for the Vendors with many options and leaving the rest in the maintree if they only have 1 deivce (eg, CanaryOne, Hydra, unPhone)
Would make the WebFlasher UX a little simpler/easier to navigate.
eg,
[FILTERBOX]
Lilygo ->
------- T-Beam
------- T-Deck
------- T-Beam
------- T-Beam S3 Core
Heltec ->
------- V3
------- Wireless Paper
------- Wireless Paper V1.0
------- Wireless Tracker
rPi ->
------- Pico
------- Pico W
------- Pi Computer S3
RakWireless ->
------- RAK11310
------- RAK4631
CanaryOne
Hydra
Unphone
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current list is getting long and requires scrolling to get down to beyond Nano G1 (at 1920x1200) so probably worse at 1920x1080.
Is it worth doing sub-tree's based on Hardware Vendor, with the ability to search to filter down the list?)
Even if done for the Vendors with many options and leaving the rest in the maintree if they only have 1 deivce (eg, CanaryOne, Hydra, unPhone)
Would make the WebFlasher UX a little simpler/easier to navigate.
eg,
[FILTERBOX]
Lilygo ->
------- T-Beam
------- T-Deck
------- T-Beam
------- T-Beam S3 Core
Heltec ->
------- V3
------- Wireless Paper
------- Wireless Paper V1.0
------- Wireless Tracker
rPi ->
------- Pico
------- Pico W
------- Pi Computer S3
RakWireless ->
------- RAK11310
------- RAK4631
CanaryOne
Hydra
Unphone
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: